[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 46 points 2 months ago

I mean, I too would not be real interested in a vehicle where parts have been known to fall off or small safety issues like oh I don't know PLOWING INTO THE GROUND SHORTLY AFTER TAKEOFF

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 41 points 3 months ago

Le sigh..... Time for another crosspost to a boring distopia.

11
submitted 4 months ago by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
73

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13793832

Layla Ahmed is, by any measure, a responsible adult. She works at a nonprofit in Nashville helping refugees. Makes 50k a year. Saves money. Pays her bills on time.

But there’s another measure of adulthood that has so far eluded her. Ahmed, 23, moved back in with her parents after graduating college in 2022. 

“There is a perception that those who live with their parents into their 20s are either bums or people who are not hard-working,” she told the Today, Explained podcast.

Being neither of those things, Ahmed and her situation actually point to a growing trend in America right now: More adults, especially younger adults, are either moving back in with family or never leaving at all. 

According to the Pew Research Center, a quarter of all adults ages 25 to 34 now live in a multigenerational living situation (which it defines as a household with two or more adult generations). 

It’s a number that’s been creeping upward since the early ‘70s but has swung up precipitously in the last 15 years. The decennial US Census measures multigenerational living slightly differently (three or more generations living together), but the trend still checks out. From 2010 to 2020, there was a nearly 18 percent increase in the number of multigenerational households.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 52 points 4 months ago

We claim that our system is intended for rehabilitation.

News to me, I did not know you guys claimed that.

102
submitted 4 months ago by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works

Title is prompt in the bingilator

278

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/11235723

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13576449

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. It must also set aside $1.5 million to help the immigrant minors who were illegally employed.

Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working illegally amid dangerous heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and other companies, according to Labor Department officials.

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. As part of a consent agreement with the federal government, the company is also required to set aside $1.5 million to help the children who were illegally employed. Ryan Pott, general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, the Japanese firm Yanmar, acknowledged the violations to NBC News.

65

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13576449

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. It must also set aside $1.5 million to help the immigrant minors who were illegally employed.

Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working illegally amid dangerous heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and other companies, according to Labor Department officials.

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. As part of a consent agreement with the federal government, the company is also required to set aside $1.5 million to help the children who were illegally employed. Ryan Pott, general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, the Japanese firm Yanmar, acknowledged the violations to NBC News.

5
40

So now after years of Canadian police blaming victims of theft of not securing their stuff, they now want you to leave your stuff unsecured. Cool, Cool, Cool cool.....

24
submitted 5 months ago by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
34
submitted 5 months ago by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works

Someone told me to run "half asleep and drooling" in the bingilator.

a lot of sad dogs later...

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 39 points 5 months ago

OH NO,

Anyway....

162

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/10891020

See title - very frustrating. There is no way to continue to use the TV without agreeing to the terms. I couldn't use different inputs, or even go to settings from the home screen and disconnect from the internet to disable their services. If I don't agree to their terms, then I don't get access to their new products. That sucks, but fine - I don't use their services except for the TV itself, and honestly, I'd rather by a dumb TV with a streaming box anyway, but I can't find those anymore.

Anyway, the new terms are about waiving your right to a class action lawsuit. It's weird to me because I'd never considered filing a class action lawsuit against Roku until this. They shouldn't be able to hold my physical device hostage until I agree to new terms that I didn't agree at the time of purchase or initial setup.

I wish Roku TVs weren't cheap walmart brand sh*t. Someone with some actual money might sue them and sort this out...

EDIT: Shout out to @testfactor@lemmy.world for recommending the brand "Sceptre" when buying my next (dumb) TV.

EDIT2: Shout out to @0110010001100010@lemmy.world for recommending LG smart TVs as a dumb-TV stand in. They apparently do require an agreement at startup, which is certainly NOT ideal, but the setup can be completed without an internet connection and it remembers input selection on powerup. So, once you have it setup, you're good to rock and roll.

23
submitted 5 months ago by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works

Had extras not suited for the challenge:

182
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 40 points 7 months ago

Ah yes that good news of the orphan crushing machine being down for at least one hour....

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 54 points 7 months ago

Ha, Ho. Steamboat Mickey says fuck your copyright.

(also no shit, AI images are just made from all the training data given to them)

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 50 points 7 months ago

What could rasing a child cost? 10$?

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 43 points 8 months ago

Hmmm, watch an ad or wait five seconds..... Not sure they thought this one out.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 45 points 9 months ago

Multiple generations.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 43 points 11 months ago

I think the issue is what if you have no parents or parents with no money (or negative moneys). You could do everything right, go to school, get a professional job, and still not be able to buy a place.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 46 points 1 year ago

"residents are being directed to an interactive map"

This seems problematic, do they not have emergency broadcasts anymore?

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This seems not very fuck cars but ok. Also who does not know you can tow with a car?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

M0oP0o

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF