Mitchie151

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Over a full career, saving 10% of your salary can allow you to live comfortably in retirement with minimal government pensions. Depends on your overall salary of course, but 10% is a good start. 250 euro a month tucked away in an account that only earns a very mediocre 5% per annum would still have you almost 400k after a 40 year career. Obviously investing more and getting a better return could lead to much much more than that. A 400k annuity at retirement age would basically continue to pay 3k a month for well, as long as you need it.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Pretty safe bet I'd say, google is going strong in the AI race and has more capital and resources than any AI startup, OpenAI included, could ever hope to match. The latest Gemini models are the top of the pack. Google also probably best positioned to best handle any downside risk if the bubble pops due to their diversity, so I suppose it's also a bit of a hedge in that regard.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Scientific consensus is that we now recognise and diagnose autism better than ever. Previously children that struggled in school would be labelled as troubled or slow or any number of other things. The thing about autism is that like many other things it is a spectrum, and thus previously many people with mild autism would have just cruised through and been thought of as odd or antisocial. Often when really questioned, people like your parents can think of a few people like this from their school days that might now fit the definition of autism spectrum disorder.

Also, it's worth noting that human DNA does not and cannot degrade in any manner you suggest and that kind of reasoning has unscientific and innapropriate connotations that might associate you with very disagreeable groups.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's basically a fact that companies that make their office desirably to be at in general get better attendance. Cheap food, good culture, good facilities all contribute. Even then, if you're at a shitty flex desk most people would much rather the comfort of their own desk, screens, peripherals. I think a huge amount of companies underinvest in this area. You have to make working from the office genuinely more enticing than working from home and one of the biggest factors here is costs. It takes an epic culture to override that cost imperative.

From the culture side:

Run events to draw people into the office. I organise takeaway once a week and it sucks heaps of people into the office for a good lunch, but really the business should facilitate that or comp it even because I've clearly proven it gets people in the office and motivated.

Design the office for collaboration, prioritise mobility so the office can be restructured for the work at hand. Minimise underused desks. I work in engineering so relocating to other desks is a huge pain when you have to bring all your hardware with you (power supplies, debuggers, oscilloscopes, programming jigs etc.) I wish my business had rolling desks or some kind of nice system for allowing these setups to move quickly and easily.

From the cost perspective:

Free or very cheap food is a huge huge perk. People hate packing and prepping a lunch in advance but it's almost always cheaper to do that or just work from home.

Free laundry is a great suggestion, save energy and water bills by doing it at the office. On-site gyms are a great incentive if they can cater to the demand because a gym membership costs a ridiculous amount.

Free EV fast charging is basically free fuel, helps cut back on that commuting cost. Or alternatively supplement public transit expenses, ebikes or even car service costs.

I'd even pitch giving employees a budget to get their own screens, keyboard, mouse etc if they make an effort to come in often enough.

Whatever it is, the more a business goes out of its way to make the office a cool place to be, and not cost more to be at than home, the more people will attend.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There probably are inefficiencies in any government that do add up to some savings, but it would be in the process and methods and not the stupid shit DOGE honed in on. They skipped the whole reason people are typically made redundant and just downsized teams that actually did need that many people. They went for the smash and grab to try and show big savings quickly without actually doing any real work.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

It's been dead for a while, I jumped ship to Summit. Pretty similar vibe, works well and I'm happy.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if no one is left at Microsoft that knows enough about the core systems to actually improve those... So the best they can do is throw more shit on top

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah that's why I deleted it after about 2 seconds haha, jumped the gun

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I see this all the time with CAPL, copilot gets close but messes so much up its not worth it. Not enough on stack overflow to train it, and until recently the docs weren't even available online to crawl.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Are you talking about sustainable/ethical investments? Because that's straight up incorrect, on average sustainable funds (often called ESG for "ethical, social, governance") outperform the market. Commonwealth bank, one of Australia's big four banks would not be making this move to end loans to the fossil fuel industry if it was genuinely going to impact their bottom line.

view more: next ›