So after a quick glance at LinkedIn, this guy seems to have done a video game podcast for years with Jonah Falcon, a weirdo who spent years trying to get famous by lying about having the biggest penis in the world.
And even that weirdo's professional recommendation of him isn't great:
"Jordan has been the co-host of the TD Gaming Podcast for years now, and has been fairly reliable and engaging."
He also seems to have worked in tech for the private healthcare industry.
Jim Henson really phoned in the creativity with the puppet designs towards the end, huh?
Already done, but it's good that you posted this here. Same goes for the recent Big Issue articles on disability benefits and this governments attack on disabled people more broadly.
No problem.
Arguably it had something to do with Britain's class system being so heavily dominated by the aristocratic class. That created space for even some reasonably wealthy, middle-class and beyond people (particularly scholars, writers, educators, doctors, occassionally clergy etc rather than industrialists for example) to recognise a top down society that they also viewed as repressive to them at some level. Similar overlapping interests helped it gain solidarity with the suffragette movement for example, which included committed communists and anarchists, but nonetheless also had its fair share of liberals and even fascists.
It's also probably worth keeping in mind that the early and argueably most directly influential years of the Fabian society and movement predated even the October revolution in 1917, never mind the Chinese communist revolution in '27, so there was a lot of 'socialism in theory' going on. By the '30s Fabians were leaving (or being pushed out) right and left for their support of Stalin in particular, but also AES states in general.
Another case of A.I. (Actually India)
It began as basically an Edwardian 'socialist but anti-revolutionary' group of bourgeois and petit-bourgeois thinkers. They were overwhelmingly middle class or above.
The key difference (and sticking point with other socialists) was that they believed in 'gradualism', not revolution. They believed that socialism would only be achieved by participation in the current political and electoral system, in order to spread socialist ideas through government, education, media etc. Their first issue and aim was arguably a reasonable one - there was no left wing never mind socialist party in British politics, just the Tories and Liberals.
Even some high profile members who were original believers left the Fabian society and grew skeptical of it pretty quickly though. H.G. Wells left after disillusionment with what he saw as a middle-class party not sufficiently different from other bourgeois parties.
And things got worse from there.
They supported the Boer war, and not just out of some fear of being branded traitors. They made their position clear by arguing that empowerment of the working classes in Britain would create a 'new imperial race' that would fight Britain's imperial wars and expand its empire around the globe. It was at that point that Bertrand Russell left in disgust, citing it becoming an imperial project as the reason.
They were admittedly a major part of the creation of the Labour Party at the turn of the century, but they were just one third of it, and plenty of people have argued the most problematic third for the advancement of socialism over the other two founders - the Independent Labour Party and the Trade Union Congress (not that they're without criticism either). And their reformism did gain some degree of popularity and results, especially around the building of social welfare and introducing ideas of social justice into the political mainstream and national identity.
It always lacked real solidarity though, fracturing over it being a nationalist, imperialist project. Fracturing further over the need the be anti-Stalinist. Then over more militant trade unions and wildcat strikes. And so on. Lots of people would point to the Fabian element in the Labour party as the wedge in the door that kept it open for the wholesale neoliberal takeover in the 1990s onwards.
He did a bit already, but no.
Well algae damned! 
He's too old for her and she's too irritating for him. It'll never work out.
Yeah it's this, and the hyperfixation combined with repetition. Considerable patience is required when you genuinely cannot segue to a related topic or different activity.
Because it's 
It makes me dare to dream. 
I'm about 80% of the way through it and it's been not just a welcome distraction from a stressful couple of weeks, but one of my favourite things I've played in a long time.
Pretty chill, but still with some challenge on higher difficulties. Wonderful art style and satisfying fold-in on themselves level design. The writing is good and succinct with what could be just another cozy game unfolding into something more varied in tone and having genuine things to say about regional identity, tourism, and commerce at the expense of locals.
What really (pleasantly) surprised me was what a love letter it was to all sorts of great past video games. Sometimes via a specific mechanic, sometimes a themed level or ability. Persona, Mario Galaxy, Zelda, Ico, SSX Tricky, Fez, classic RPGs, you name it.
Anyway, I think it's pretty neat.
If a harcore band sings in mostly German, old fucks are wearing black and red pins by the bar, and I tell you (in English) at the bar that you're likely to get your arse kicked as American tourists, you probably shouldn't jump in with the regulars and then be all 
when you catch a stray to the shouldershoulder to the chest.
BRB, gonna do a little anti-fascist praxis as a treat.