SCOTUS said he could
TLDR: Folks, vote harder.
What did that climate bill she's talking about actually do? When it comes to the US and climate, all I'm aware of is they propagandise against buying Chinese solar panels, propagandose against EVs and hinder the development of support infrastructure for them, and refuse to ratify international agreements.
Trump is just nervously inching closer and closer to Joe
And then they kiss
Guy's just feeling uncomfortable because under traditional gender role expectations she is 'outmanning' him by a country mile.
chances are, they’d think you’re a Marxist or someone old-fashioned in their speech…
This isn't a good thing; it's a result of a concerted effort to make people think Marxism is old and irrelevant.
I really dislike the notion that we should stop using the term 'bourgeoisie' just because of the pop notion that it's an outdated word and that nobody knows how to spell it.
Yes, the English language is constantly evolving and terms fall out of use, but as they do so the language doesn't just reflect the dominant thought patterns but reinforces them. English has a high chance to remain the most popular global lingua franca even after Western hegemony falls, and the evolution of the language will remain a battle ground.
There is slow progress in people learning that liberalism means liberty for markets and not for people, but most people still think it means liberation of individuals, genders and minorities. The fastest way to 'liberate' someone from that error is to get them understanding the class conflict, and the term 'bourgeoisie' is still relevant to that.
I love this protest sign:
As if the US Government gives a shit about Americans' quality of life.
First "that phrase is a call for genocide because we said so" combined with the more recent "maybe we should stop calling everything 'genocide'" whenever anyone describes what Israel is doing.
Utterly cooked.
Christ the comments here are exactly like the thread about China officially supporting a two-state solution.
"I understand the material reasons why China said what it said but I'm still gonna criticize them for not saying something far more immediately gratifying, even though I understand how it would completely undermine everything they're working to achieve."
You're all smarter than this. You all know who benefits most if China drops the ball to have a little gloat. Their words are lamenting Kissinger's passing, but their actions are continuing to destroy his legacy.
Lemmy.world will always take immediate action to remove and ban any posts or comments that incite violence or propagate hatred.
Most of the .world comments I've seen here fit that criteria.
So let me ask this; who is really censoring who here?
There's a youtube video I watched 3 years ago, by a Chinese content creator about the great firewall. His closing comment was a prediction that over 5-10 years we'd see China slowly reduce its internet censorship and 'other nations' start to build their own. It's looking more and more like that's going to be the case, and it's happening even faster below the national censorship level. The pattern of who's defederating from whom is another facet of that.
Truth is a powerful ally.
Let them hide. Their users know where to find us when they get curious about what's on the other side.
But do convert Tanner.