Nexus

joined 1 week ago
[โ€“] Nexus@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I read on the keepandroidopen github that the "advanced flow" (for "side-loading") is delivered through Google Play Services, not the Android OS, meaning Google can modify, restrict, or remove it at any time without an OS update and without any user consent.

So, yes, I think you're right, GrapheneOS, PostmarketOS, /e/OS and the likes would be safe (for now) since they don't have the "Google Play Services". I read MicroG is a way to get core functionalities of the Play Services API.

For Linux phone, the Jolla phone has peeked my interest. But I would be missing Android apps, unless there is virtualization to run those??

[โ€“] Nexus@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks. I will do those things.๐Ÿ’ช

In addition to GrapheneOS (Motorola/ Google Pixel), I was considering brands made in the EU: Jolla phone with Linux or FairPhone with eOS.

[โ€“] Nexus@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

And here there's a list of regulators to which you can complain: https://keepandroidopen.org/cta/#consumers

[โ€“] Nexus@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

So sad. Hmm, a different OS? PostmarketOS? eOS? Try if those support your device.

[โ€“] Nexus@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I was thinking might be better to get a phone developed in the EU. I'm considering Jolla phone (Finnish) and FairPhone (Dutch). Or else a Pixel with GrapheneOS (but then it's Google again :/).

Are those sufficiently "open"?

 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/46445602

Is this still going to happen? What can we do?

 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/46445602

Is this still going to happen? What can we do?

 

Is this still going to happen? What can we do?

Edit: Complain to your competent authorities here: https://keepandroidopen.org/cta/#consumers