Charged, brought to trial, and convicted of NOTHING. Zero people went to jail for shooting those students. That's the "serious" attitude the US takes to first amendment rights.
Did you actually think you'd somehow lessen or half-way justify FUCKING GENOCIDE because of the intricacies of realpolitik? Are you serious?!
Get increasingly and never-endingly fucked.
Stop being the chud, then. EZPZ.
The next headline: Chinese Economy on the brink of ruin from too much innovation
Ah yes, the famously non-ideological and trustworthy AP and NPR.
They're projecting. They're imaging the petty things they'd like to ban to control and humiliate their political opponents and then applying that same deranged behavior to people of an entirely different culture.
In lib world, they would definitely arrest huge swaths of the poeple daily (or at least try to) for frivolous bullshit which is, for some reason, of huge importance to them. The difference is that they think they could actually be effective in doing so and that those primitive Chinese people are just too inherently inept and weak to achieve the desired result.
We put down non-rabid dogs every single day who are far less dangerous
This is actual Roger Stone/Trump behavior. I simply do not understand how people who call themselves democrats are not demanding her immediate resignation and that any communication she has with the media/general public be strictly controlled. It should be unbearably embarrassing to anyone who even remotely supports the Democratic party.
It's so incredibly far beyond the pale for one of the most prominent leaders of the party to publicly say this shit at all, let alone during an election year to the very group of people they claim to represent.
I honestly did not think Dem leadership could be more openly craven and disgusting to their constituents than they already were, but here we are. There truly is no limit.
Marginally less bad
Right? I live in a region of the US where most of my neighbors are openly RW, armed, and publicly joke about killing people like me. And liberals think their particular definition of 'legal need'' is something I should give two shits about?
Ok but it doesn't fit in a T-shirt, does it?
Why not Zoidberg?