I've always disliked how this is described as a paradox. It only highlights a broader point found in many systems, a just system is never about "the good" outnumbering "the bad". It's about a balanced equilibrium, as are most relationships. Besides, allowing intolerance is not a tolerant act, that's not the way we define that term. To make such a claim would be as ridiculous as a racist person saying they are practicing tolerance by not challenging or question any of their bigoted thoughts and instead just letting them play out.
PopularUsername
joined 2 years ago
I've seen Italian sites that will put up a pay wall if you refuse the cookies.
As per the article, this is to be expected, so it doesn't really mean anything, "SEC staff have traditionally used every possible comment and review period to delay making final decisions until those 240 days have elapsed, making Thursday's agency filings expected."
You are reading as though it is undisputed facts. One reason it is undisputed is because the victim is dead. For one it would be nice to see how likely it was he actually broke glass or reached inside. Was it clear video from a camera at the door? Or some grainy footage from a neighbor across the street? It doesn't say.
Much like his company, it's a copy off of Elon Musk
"If you buy a car that does not have the hardware for full self-driving, it is like buying a horse,”
Edit: This is supposed to be an insult to the Rivian CEO, making the same dumb jokes. Not a state of support to Elon, the whole context around that quote is wrong.
Yeah that and the Bitcoin post. My .world account was having weird glitches, but I haven't used this one much yet, but haven't run into any issues yet with sdf. (Edit, I realize I commented in two different Bitcoin communities, the first one was .world)
Thanks for the tip, I'll look into that
Probably easier to skim through my history. Yes I believe so, so long as it is @lemmy.world community right? Not relevant where OP is from?
Okay thanks, that makes sense. I'm not highly technical so I'm just trying to run through every potential risk. That was the last thing bugging me.
I always thought this for the financial market: Standard & Poor
Moody
The Fed (as in, the past tense of feed)
100% that's why they call it a passphrase and not a password, it would be foolish to use something that can be brute forced. Anyways, my question is specifically about the storage of the key when unencrypted, would you happen to know if it ever touches the hard drive?
Karl Popper is a cool dude, I'm sure if I read his paper on this topic I would completely agree with his points, it's still a relevant conversation to be had. I just don't like the term paradox. "If you are too nice to people you will get taken advantage of" is not a paradox. The paradox is just a variation on that.