SoleInvictus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

My partner and I have surprisingly little in common when it comes to interests. I like a lot of nerd stuff: homelab, 3d printing, robotics, brewing, welding, woodworking, sci-fi, etc. They like not nerd stuff: copaganda shows, murder porn (podcasts and documentaries), dog training, cooking, etc. I like metal, they like jangly indie, we both like punk. We both really love cats.

We also both hate small talk, so we only discuss what we find to be pertinent or interesting. Since we have a lot of individual interests, we actually have a lot to talk about. We just had a really great conversation on using Docker or a VM to circumvent some silly online testing issues. Otherwise, it's just comfortable silence. I really love them.

1+ for koreader, it's so much better than the stock Kindle reader.

It's really the best. Those three days are completely useless for anything other than work, though.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought baby pygmy hippo.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even with the fine, it's still financially advantageous for the landlord. They'll make that $100k back in about four years (accounting for taxes) given the extra $700 they're pulling in per tenant. Then they'll just make an extra $2800/month ad perpetuum. There really needs to be greater repercussions for actions like these.

Thankfully no longer the case according to his Patreon account:

https://www.patreon.com/billmessnerloebs

I'D CRANK YOUR HOG AND YOUR DOG'S HOG BROTHER

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I see you're familiar with the Two Santas strategy. Link for those not familiar, and you really need to be familiar.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Let's pretend there are only $100 in our imaginary economy which buys and sells a limited supply of 100 bricks at $1/brick. You ask to borrow $50 to buy 50 bricks, so a lender loans you $50, to be repaid with 10% interest. You work and are paid from the other $50 owned by others. Eventually, you pay back $55 (due to interest). There's still only $100 in the economy throughout this exercise, just the relative proportions owned by people change.

Alternately, the government prints that $50 and gives it to you (this is a gross oversimplification of quantitative easing). Now there are $150 in the system. The brick sellers know the government has done this and that you have more money, so they bump up their prices to $1.50 simply because they want the most money possible. $1 now buys less, 33.3% less.

view more: ‹ prev next ›