Tamo240

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Interesting, could be a move away from typewise, do you support their gestures? Left to delete and up for capitalised.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Like, you might have someone working on something in a new codebase but misunderstanding the architecture or just going in the wrong direction in general and a review is the best way to correct course before getting too far in

I think the article is suggesting this person should be pair programmed with until they understand the architecture and can be trusted to contribute correctly, and I actually kind of agree - it always feels terrible to tell someone a PR they've worked on possibly for days is completely the wrong direction, and arguably this is already 'too far in' if they're going to need to essentially start again.

Intervening earlier in the process should lead to less wasted effort overall, but people often seem to treat pair programming like its two people at 50% efficiency, when it actually saves a lot of cycle time on reviewing code.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any service you depend on in the modern world, you need to be asking yourself 'what will I do when this enshitifies itself'. And it is a when.

Short termism on all sides is destroying our society.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

For playing with, rather than 'serious' projects

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

More than the huge amount of trash floating there? I feel this is missing the forest for the trees

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you are referring to the public actions of the President of the United States as 'deep state' you're just mad at the state. No need to jump at shadows when there is a very real and very objectional government right there doing it in the open.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

Alternatively, following their logic, keep the number of people and achieve massively higher productivity. But they don't want that, they want to reduce the number of people having opinions and diluting the share pool, because its not about productivity, its about exerting control.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

Sorry but what even is a 'technical 1v1'?

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unit tests are exactly for code that is often rewritten, because it ensures that whatever interface still behaves the same, regardless of the implementation. This a large portion of the point of unit tests: not for testing the initial implementation but confirming that any subsequent implementation behaves the same.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're seeing insufferable people who also happen to use Linux, as insufferable people also like to be early adopters so they can say they are different and therefore better.

There are plenty of super helpful people in the community, and Linux is well past the early adopter phase. The transition from Windows is smoother than it has ever been.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 14 points 10 months ago

Because its so much better for kids to use dodgy free VPNs to access sketchy fringe porn sites than to just talk to them about healthy sex at a younger age.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

500,000 people joining a mailing list would probably result in around 25,000 (5%) actually paying for a membership. This is still extremely impressive for a new party, but people really need to stop comparing the number to other party's paying memberships.

 

Following the budget announcement in the UK, why is the media obsessed with the predicted growth being 0.2% lower, instead of applauding the much needed investment in our public services? Does it really matter that much?

view more: next ›