[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Don’t worry if you’re a tory though, keir starmer has your back!

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 month ago

Merlin Bird ID

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 month ago

Hatsune miku is copyleft!

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 3 months ago

It’s like one of those bags you always use for groceries instead of a disposable one.

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 3 months ago

They want to be able to have their information available where the population can see it. The population was/is on facebook so they post information to facebook. They did not rely on it, they just used it as another avenue for communication. Still good that they’re moving off of it though.

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 4 months ago

I mean technically alaska has a southern border

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 5 months ago

To be fair they don’t refrain from calling it a religious war. Though using the term “holy war” instead of jihad is most definitely to dumb it down for Americans who don’t know “jihad” is not just a term for islamic terrorism

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 months ago

Weird, it doesn’t feel corporate at all to me. A flat, simple design doesn’t immediately mean something’s corporate.

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 6 months ago

Strong towns does that.

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 months ago

I don’t even think AMC holds full rights to breaking bad and better call saul. I think those both lie with Sony, who’s made the shows.

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 8 months ago

Definitely Rocky Linux

[-] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 10 months ago

Open-source software (OSS) is computer software that is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose. from Wikipedia

The same article also talks about the difference between open source and source available:

Although the OSI definition of "open-source software" is widely accepted, a small number of people and organizations use the term to refer to software where the source is available for viewing, but which may not legally be modified or redistributed. Such software is more often referred to as source-available, or as shared source, a term coined by Microsoft in 2001

view more: ‹ prev next ›

WaterSword

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF