[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 8 points 16 hours ago

because no reasonable investor would rely on such statements

is that a real legal classification? It sounds mythological. Like, there must be more credible sightings of Moth-man than there are "reasonable investors".

49
[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

i guess the real "Parasitic Mind" was the friends we made along the way

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 29 points 2 days ago

Our position as the international hegemon is definitely in decline, but yeah outright collapse doesn't seem likely.

Look at Britain; just a century ago they were in the position we are in now. They're no longer at the head of global empire, but all their political structures and institutions still exist today prettymuch unchanged.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

90 minuets? This guy needs a movie's worth a screen time to... what, warble about how awful it is that art is getting critical analysis?

209
[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

Nobody has clocks on their walls anymore sadness

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago

I like it, but I like the name "gravity battery" even better.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

This really hurts to watch.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not sure. I use a credit union and they don't, but that may not be a good indicator for general practices.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

Go to your bank and ask for a cashier's check, (make sure your info is in the memo). With a cashier's check, the bank takes the money out of your account immediately, so whenever the agency cashes the check, they're taking the money from the banks account.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 70 points 5 days ago

I think the couple that leaked microfilm detailing how to make a nuke to the USSR are heroes of the globe.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 14 points 6 days ago

less weird than still being on twitter at this point

142
submitted 1 week ago by Wheaties@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sen. Bernie Sanders is preparing several resolutions that would stop more than $20 billion in U.S. arms sales to Israel, a longshot effort but the most substantive pushback yet from Congress over the devastation in Gaza ahead of the first year anniversary of the Israel-Hamas war.

In a letter to Senate colleagues on Wednesday, Sanders said the U.S. cannot be “complicit in this humanitarian disaster.” The action would force an eventual vote to block the arms sales to Israel, though majority passage is highly unlikely.

“Much of this carnage in Gaza has been carried out with U.S.-provided military equipment,” Sanders, I-Vt., wrote.

As the war grinds toward a second year, and with the outcome of President Joe Biden’s efforts to broker a cease-fire deal and hostage release uncertain, the resolutions from Sanders would seek to reign in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s assault on Gaza. The war has killed some 41,000 people in Gaza after the surprise Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack that killed about 1,200 people in Israel, and abducted 250 others, with militants still holding around 100 hostages.

While it’s doubtful the politically split Senate would pass the measures, the move is designed to send a message to the Netanyahu regime that its war effort is eroding the U.S.'s longtime bipartisan support for Israel. Sanders said he is working with other colleagues on the measures.

[...]

Under the Senate rules, once Sanders introduces the resolutions next week, he can force a vote almost instantly for consideration. The measures are being proposed as a joint resolution of disapproval of the arms sales, which is a mechanism that allows congressional oversight of foreign affairs.

Sanders said he would have some backing for his proposal. But it is not expected to have support from a majority, 51 votes, in the Senate to pass.

In the House, blocking the Israeli arms sales would face even tougher odds, where Republicans hold the majority, and have largely sided with Netanyahu’s approach to the war with Hamas.

139
27

Oh, Wizard of Oz is such a silly children's story! No, it's an incomprehensible screed about the gold standard, the lion and the scarecrow and the tinman are supposed to be biting depictions of, like, long dead guys in 19th century US politics. What was it trying to argue? Fucking no idea anymore.

Let's make a Jack Black film about Gulliver's Travels! What... it's supposed to be about the British empire? What do you mean, it's just a funny story about little guys!

Flatland is like 2% science fiction and 98% about class society, but don't tell that to the guys who spent a whole documentary misinterpreting what researchers mean by "observe" when talking about quantum physics.

I'm tired of these obvious political satires, make it inscrutable again! It doesn't matter how clearly you spell it out, people are gonna miss it anyway, so why not give anime artists another weird thing to draw on for when they run out of source comics?

56
submitted 3 weeks ago by Wheaties@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net

I liked half the ending. It's a shame that we had to slam the brakes for the other half of it so

.Dukat and Kai Winn can be satanists. I like the idea that Sisko ends up joining the Prophets outside time, but it never really feels like the writers knew what to do with him being a spiritual figure for Bajor. This ending just kind of happened.


Anyway, I'm posting this 'cus there used to be a user here with the name SiskoDidTwoThingsWrong, and i'm wondering what those two things were? Keeping the cure to the changeling disease seems like the most obvious one. I'm curious what the second is

92
submitted 4 weeks ago by Wheaties@hexbear.net to c/science@hexbear.net

https://www.livescience.com/animals/birds/mice-on-remote-island-that-eat-albatrosses-alive-sentenced-to-death-by-bombing-scientists-decree

Invasive mice are devouring albatrosses alive on a remote island in the Indian Ocean, so conservationists have come up with an explosive solution — "bombing" the mice.

Mice have been wreaking havoc on Marion Island, between South Africa and Antarctica, for decades. Humans accidentally introduced the mice in the 19th century, and the rodents have since developed a taste for wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) and other threatened seabirds.

The Mouse-Free Marion Project, a collaboration between the South African government and BirdLife South Africa, is trying to raise $29 million to drop 660 tons (600 metric tons) of rodenticide-laced pellets onto the island in winter 2027, AFP news agency reported on Saturday (Aug. 24).

The project plans to send a squad of helicopters to drop the pellets. By striking in winter when the mice are most hungry, the conservationists hope to eradicate the entire mouse population of up to 1 million individuals.

229
Glorified Websites (hexbear.net)
10
68
oh.... (hexbear.net)
6
submitted 1 month ago by Wheaties@hexbear.net to c/music@hexbear.net
113

Not that anybody asked, but I think it's important to understand how shame and guilt actually work before you try to use it for good.

It's a necessary emotion. There are reasons we have it. It makes everything so. much. worse. when you use it wrong.

Shame and guilt are DE-motivators. They are meant to stop behavior, not promote it. You cannot, ever, in any meaningful way, guilt someone into doing good. You can only shame them into not doing bad.

Let's say you're a parent and your kid is having issues.

Swearing in class? Shame could work. You want them to stop it. Keep it in proportion, and it might help. (KEEP IT IN PROPORTION!!!)

Not doing their homework? NO! STOP! NO NOT DO THAT! EVER! EVER! EVER! You want them to start to do their homework. Shaming them will have to opposite effect! You have demotivated them! They will double down on NOT doing it. Not because they are being oppositional, but because that's what shame does!

You can't guilt people into building better habits, being more successful, or getting more involved. That requires encouragement. You need to motivate for that stuff!

If you want it in a simple phrase:

You can shame someone out of being a bad person, but you can't shame them into being a good person.


It was nice to see this put so clearly. This election cycle has left me exhausted and demotivated, and this hits it square on the head.

stolen from https://grungekitty-77.tumblr.com/post/754482938951892992/fun-fact-that-was-literally-what-inspired-me-to

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 128 points 10 months ago

You're gonna have to explain to millions of women across the country why there is a national abortion ban and they no longer have a constitional, fundamental right to an abortion.

The democrats had the house, senate, and presidency when Dobbs went into effect. They didn't even try to enact a legislative solution. Fuck off.

view more: next ›

Wheaties

joined 3 years ago