HIV is next, then cancer. China now has the kind of state scientific infrastructure that the US had in the 1950s. For some reason the USA is actively trying to destroy theirs.
ZMoney
The man ad libbed an hour and a half speech at Davos. We've been hearing reports of his impending demise since 2016. He's got at least another 10 years even if he shits his pants every day.
Somehow it hits differently after our society decided that human rights were a thing.
Does it really liquify your liver though? Curious how it would do this.
Haiti should have just patiently waited to gain their independence.
70% of Americans believe in angels. If you take the extreme end of that statistic you can just insert any crazy belief.
Just come to Eastern Europe where every trend arrives a decade later.
"If you don't give me a Nobel Peace Prize I'll go to war with you."
Ok I just don't see a reasonable way that less children helps to fight the oligarchy. Not having enough nurses to take care of all the dying boomers does what to further the cause? Eliminating labor doesn't work the same way as withholding labor. I can't exactly imagine a childless adult union so what would the plan even be?
Who do you think suffers most during economic turmoil though? If you want to fuck up the economy in a productive way you need mass action, for which you need a mobilized working class. Reducing the number of workers doesn't help with this.
Yeah funny thing is this is basically what we're already doing. China's one child policy and neoliberal austerity everywhere else ensured the current generation of children is smaller than ever. We're running the experiment now, and overall we'd be fine if the countries that have negative growth rates weren't so xenophobic and let immigrants in to replace their ageing workforce.
Twenty years ago I would have agreed, there's too many people, but now the pendulum is swinging the other way.
We've been hearing this for decades. Care to cite some actual data?