I think my largest issue was that they argued their point using a google-summary of an article. Thanks for linking the actual source.

"Do you want to sleep with me?"

"False"

To be fair, if he said what he wrote here in private, it'd still be extremely bad leadership.

Obviously he should correct them and point out why, but maybe not trash on them entierly.

This is not exactly true and just now the court ruled that Postnord does not need to do it yet.

We'll need to wait a few days until we know for sure what will happen. But for now Postnord does not need to deliver the license plates to Tesla.

https://www.domstol.se/nyheter/2023/11/inga-omedelbara-sakerhetsatgarder-mot-postnord/

Not exactly the same, but somebody recently did 1-60 on WoW HC Classic while walking on a treadmill.

Sorry for the reddit link: https://old.reddit.com/r/classicwow/comments/14n7d0y/hardcore_treadmill_world_first/

Exactly. Here in Sweden if you live into a newly built apartement you are basically guranteed grade A sound isolation.

Even older ones usually hold high quality because of renovations.

It's hard to say with the limited context.

But the word is obviously, in certain contexts, derogatory towards women. However, I feel like, especially on the internet, you have to consider that the user using the term might not be a native speaker and could possibly be using it unintentionally.

I'd argue that a warning and explanatory comment would be the first step, unless it's a repeat offender. Otherwise you are more likely to create enemies who won't learn.

It's like having a car with 3 punctures and 1 wheel-lock.

I honestly believe people are way overvaluing the responses ChatGPT gives.

For a lot of boilerplating scenarios or trying to resolve some pretty standard stuff, it's good.

I had an issue a while back with QueryDSL running towards an MSSQL instance, which I tried resolving by asking ChatGPT some pretty straightforward questions regarding the tool. Without going too much into detail, I basically got stuck in a loop where ChatGPT kept suggesting solutions that were not viable at all in QueryDSL. I pointed it out, trying to point out why what it did was wrong and it tried correcting itself suggesting the same broken solutions.

The AI is great until whatever it has been taught previously doesn't cover your situation. My solution was a bit of digging in google away, which helpfully made me resolve the issue. But had I been stuck with only ChatGPT I'd still be going around in loops.

That's the equivalent to incel.

Legbeard is the neckbeard equivalent.

It wouldn't surprise me if the implementation has bias towards Chromium based browsers as both street view and Chromium are from Google.

I think most people who have switched sides, who were originally for/split, would today argue that it's unlikely that Russia would stage another war in the coming years. Looking at how poorly they are performing in Ukraine.

So getting into NATO with the possibility that Erdogan's demands will have an actual effect on the Swedish laws has not been deemed worth it right now.

I also doubt anybody reasonable would consider some of his demands to be achievable, Turkey in EU today?