These are known as souvenir plots. Generally, you aren't buying the land, but rather you're buying a contractual right to prevent the actual owner from developing the land.
charonn0
Californian. No.
It wouldn't solve any problems that can't be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven't had to worry about before. It'd be a net loss for everyone involved.
Californian. No.
It wouldn't solve any problems that can't be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven't had to worry about before. It'd be a net loss for everyone involved.
Insufficient data for a meaningful answer.
From what I can tell it's a tweet in which they "recommend" his nomination, rather than nominate him themselves.
While members of national legislatures are allowed to nominate people for a Nobel prize, national governments per se are not.
These are the same Senators who argued ex-presidents can't be impeached.
Jobs being made obsolete by new technology is one thing.
Artists having their works taken and profited off of without consent, attribution, or compensation is another.
He will portray Neevok, half man, half dog, half orchid.
It could certainly be used as evidence in your favor. Whether it by itself would be enough to exonerate you would depend on things like the evidence against you and how much weight the jury gave to your records.