Suppose they gave a war and no one came.
davel
It’s been 28 years already? Christ I’m old. Kowloon Walled City was razed 31 years ago.
Since people seem interested in the morality angle, allow me to introduce U. of Macao philosophy professor Hans-Georg Moeller.
I’m glad I was never subjected to whatever mental gymnastics are in Arendt’s horseshoe theory polemic.
Looks like they took it down. You might try here: https://annas-archive.org/search?q=Pedagogy+of+the+Oppressed
I’ve never been to r/tankiejerk, but I assume it’s just libs circle ~~jerking~~virtue signaling their anticommunism. I think they’re the “Anti Kitten-Burning Coalition”: https://redsails.org/false-witnesses/
Every once in a while, I am sorry to say, some sick bastard sets fire to a kitten. This is something that happens. Like all crimes, it shouldn’t happen, but it does. And like most crimes, it makes the paper. The effects of this appalling cruelty are not far-reaching, but the incidents are reported in the papers because the cruelty is so flagrant and acute that it seems newsworthy.
The response to such reports is horror and indignation, which is both natural and appropriate. But the expression of that horror and indignation also produces something strange.
[O]ne also came away from reading that thread with the sense that people seemed to think this ultra-minimal moral stance made them exceptional and exceptionally righteous. Like the earlier editorial writers, they seemed to think they were exhibiting courage by taking a bold position on a matter of great controversy. Whatever comfort might be gleaned from the reaffirmation that most people were right about this non-issue issue was overshadowed by the discomfiting realization that so many people also seemed to want or need most others to be wrong.
The kitten-burners seem to fulfill some urgent need. They give us someone we can clearly and correctly say we’re better than. Their extravagant cruelty makes us feel better about ourselves because we know that we would never do what they have done. They thus function as signposts of depravity, reassuring the rest of us that we’re Not As Bad As them, and thus letting us tell ourselves that this is the same thing as us being good.
[I]f the kitten-burners didn’t already exist, we would have to invent them.
I don’t think they’re interested in understanding us, nor that any of it is in good faith. I think they’re interested in using us as a straw man that they can pin any cartoonish fear or moral depravity on, and then condemn us for those things, and then pat each other on the back for their righteousness and bravery. Same with c/tankiejerk and c/meanwhileongrad.
I mean, whatever was Stalin thinking, allying with Hitler’s enemies, or Mao allying with he KMT?
This episode was brought to you by NordVPN.
I don’t think I’m yet able to fully believe levels of haute bourgeois calcification & incompetence I think I’m seeing. It really is failsons all the way down, innit.
Whether or not the analogy is sound, it seems to be problematic pedagogically because of the easy conflation among the two distinct senses of power used. It also can cause confusion between constant capital, e.g. the cost of an engine, and variable capital, meaning labor power, measured in e.g. cost per worker-hour.
China’s moving up the value chain.