My controversial opinion is that if everyone has the right to self identification, I have the right to reject that identification. I am under neither logical nor moral obligation to accept another person's beliefs about themselves or the world. Keep in mind I firmly assert that all people deserve to be treated with kindness and respect, I am making a descriptive not a normative statement. This is strictly a question of retaining the right to epistemological determination, "self identification" being based on that same exact fundamental premise.
definitely_AI
Do you think people with autism, downs syndrome, or cognitive impairments should have kids?
Forming relationships with people that are different (as in, not relatives) helps avoid the bad parts of the family structure
That is an argument from utility, which can most certainly be debated. What constitutes "bad"? That is a subjective interpretation.
where the weirdness persists and grows, until it reaches weird shit.
And how do we define "weird shit"? Are "normal" relationships not "weird shit" and don't they lead to "weird shit"?
their DNA and having their own biological kids as if it mattered.
Well, it matters to them. Therefore, it matters. Doesn't it? It does to them.
Genuinely just poking at arguments here, I have no decided opinion either way.
People have the right to define themselves however they want. Likewise, people have the right not to share those determinations.
If others have the right to see themselves however they want, I have the right to see themselves however I want too. Reciprocity works like that.
You want the truth? YOU WANT THE TRUTH?
You can't handle my ban record.
Nice try, sitting this one out.
No sorrow.
Only potato.
Such is life.
See the problem with "identity" and what is "reality" and what things "are" or "are not" are profoundly complex philosophical questions that have been deeply, deeply thought about by the most brilliant minds of mankind since thousands of years, and they are yet to be solved.
That is why all claims about what something or someone "is" or "is not" is fraught with paradoxes that just collapse on themselves, and all claims to some sort of objective truth and finality are just fantasies.
What matters is to treat people with kindness and respect whoever they are. That's what I think. Doesn't mean we are obligated to believe whatever it is they believe. Everyone is free to believe what they want. That includes the right not to believe what someone else believes. That's what I believe.
Literally nothing is stopping you.
You replied to me. I support equal rights and humane treatment for everyone, I simply reject the idea that your beliefs require me to surrender my own judgments about reality.
I have not been offensive in any way, you are the one resorting to domination techniques and accusations and emotional outbursts. If you don't want to accept other people's beliefs you can always just move along.
You accuse me of phobia. I am not phobic in the slightest. My sister is in a loving relationship with her girlfriend since ten years back, and my little brother is literally trans.
Please do not throw out frivolous accusations just because you have your ideas challenged, it is a vile practice and only outs you as dogmatic.
Well, people very often treat me as something I am not. They don't know me. I don't know me. Being human is hard. Knowing something about oneself is a very complicated proposition. Knowing something about others is even harder. What does it mean to "know oneself"? How can I expect others to know who and what I am if I can't be certain myself?
If people thought I was a lizard I would question their sanity, for sure. Nobody in their right mind mistakes a person for a lizard. That is just crazy.
Or homophobic, or transphobic, or other flavor of the month phobic.
If you disagree with their stated world view, you are being irrational, hateful, and must be censored. Which is ironic considering that what they demand is of the world to accept their version of reality at face value.