this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
59 points (95.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38228 readers
1718 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Give me something juicy

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 minutes ago (1 children)

Children are a distinct category from adolescents (and shouldn't be lumped together), and both categories should have more autonomy over their own lives, bodies, and education. That includes being able to not consent to child genital mutilation (whether biologically male or intersex, female is already illegal), being able to consent to immunisations against the wishes of their parents/guardians - and likewise for puberty blockers/HRT later on, if they're trans - and having autonomy over their schoolday, which school they go to, and what their schedule looks like.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago (1 children)

Are you as wise and knowledgeable today as when you were a child?

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 minutes ago

I'm wise enough to know that my life would be a lot better if my opinions over my own body and education were respected at the time.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 minutes ago

IDK how controversial this one is, but I'd say Batman Beyond is a near perfect "I am the new Batman" type sequel series. Rather than having a series where it's all future versions of the villains facing off against future Batman, they either made new villains or reinvented one you never really saw anywhere besides a few old comics.

From what I've seen/heard of the non tie-in comics, they aren't as good, IMO, for the introduction of characters such as a future Catwoman and a few minor changes to some original characters, like turning that one Joker gang member into some sort of hybrid Joker and Two Face.

Very similar reasons as to why I think Loonatics s1 is vastly superior to season 2. Hand me original villains for a series over rehashed versions of old villains.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Cars 2 is the best of the series.

[–] bsit@sopuli.xyz 3 points 55 minutes ago

Consciousness is fundamental to reality. Science-based thinking (but not science itself) has put matter as the fundamental element but actually has never been able to prove it. To be able to prove that matter gives rise to consciousness, you'd have to step out of consciousness and point to matter. Which you cannot do. Not talking about individual consciousness where you can just point at someone's brain: that experience of pointing at someone's brain is happening inside consciousness, how else would you know about it.

Not to be confused with Solipsism, that's the thinking mind. I'm talking about Idealism, the raw state of pure experience before thought.

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Sunny weather fucking sucks. Overcast is by far the best weather. You don't have to deal with sun in your eyes, or glare or feeling like your skin is burning after 30 minutes of standing outside. You can still see everything just fine.

I got to live in San Francisco for a few years and going outside to 10 C cloudy, foggy or overcast weather (almost) everyday was amazing. It was literally the most perfect weather I have ever experienced and the only thing I miss about that city.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Apparently saying new Star Trek is trash writing is enough to get banned from certain instances.

"But NU TREK IS MY ENTIRE PERSONALITY, IT MAKES ME FEEL SMART AND DIFFERENT (and if you dislike it, you dislike me 🥺)!"

They'll never say it but they don't have to.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

It is, though.

[–] bigboismith@lemmy.world 0 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

The US isn't the great Satan, they are quite contemporary satan. Russia, China and Iran are all imperialist, anti democratic and have even worse human rights violations.

You don't have to pick a side, these are all asshats, some more than other though.

This is either American cope, pure misinformation, or both. Certainly not an opinion, and easily verifiable nonsense (do you want to do it by number of foreign interventions, coups, murders? You name it and, if it's in the last century, the answers won't be surprising at all). USA #1, right? And yes, no serious person "picks sides", this isn't football, this is geopolitics.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Plastic straw pollution doesn't have a measurable impact on the environment.

The entire thing about banning plastic straws comes from some high schooler using back-of-a-napkin math to guess how many straws are in the ocean in what was clearly a successful attempt at starting a science fair project the night before it was due. Some news station picked it up, and then a bunch of science-illiterates ran away with it.

You can't determine the impact of pollution by count. Straws are tiny and weigh almost nothing. If you skip buying one pair of sneakers in your life, then you've successfully reduced your plastic use by almost a lifetime of plastic straws.

Removing plastic straws is probably the single least impactful way to reduce plastic pollution. It's pure virtue signaling: it's about presenting an image of being environmentally conscious while doing effectively nothing to help the environment.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 3 hours ago

Yes, but I don't think this is particularly controversial, perhaps just not widely known.

I think it's more of the same strategy from polluters - privatise profits and socialise detriments.

If a government says to plastic producers "what can we do to help you minimise use of plastic" answers like "make straws and shopping bags illegal" are of course in their favor. They don't cost producers anything to implement, and they make consumers feel like they've already done the "hard work" of solving plastic waste.

Of course a much better approach would be to tax products that include any kind of plastic, as that would have a meaningful impact but would ultimately cost producers as they pivot to other materials.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I'd like to up you one on this and include the EU law requiring soda caps are tethered to bottles.

From the link:

The European Commission estimated that plastic caps and lids represented around 13 per cent of plastic marine litter caught in the nets of fishing vessels between 2011 and 2017.

I don't understand where this number comes from, but it seems suspicious. Does the mean people properly throw the bottle away and just say, "meh, I'll go out of my way to throw the just the cap into the ocean" or does the bottle "breakdown" (into microplastics) at a different rate than the cap? If so, then having them tethered won't change anything, right? Or maybe this is just some "feel good number" to make government officials feel like "their making meaningful change", without actually changing anything.

[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Ranked voting. Fined heavily if you don’t. Politicians need to reveal their donors and sponsorships and lobbyists at the start of every speech like a YouTube reviewer does when they receive something for free. We shouldn’t need sites that reveal who is owned by AIPAC, etc.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

OP asked for the most controversial. You listed a few. Which do you think is most controversial?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›