ghurab

joined 2 years ago
[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Is this a joke or did you not read the article?

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But his comment is relevant the toppic.

Modern industrial famring utilizes forced insemination with a tool operated by a human.

A reasonable person could argue that it's not sexual assault becuase the act was not for sextial gratification, but purely utilitarian in order to obtain a baby cow, disregarding the welfare of the cow.

In other words, whether an act is sexual assault or not depends on the intentions of the actor, regardless of the experience of the subject and physical nature of the act.

If you fill in "human" as your subject in the above formula, a reasonable person could conclude that the experience of the subject does, infact, matter.

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I use systemd-nspawn to absolutely pissoff everyone :)

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Even if they wanted to, how would they accomplish that?

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

2 out of the 4 countries boardings Israel, Jordan and Egypt, have peace treaties with Israel. The Arab gulf nations were in the processes of normalizing relations.

Lebanon(Hezbollah) and Syria were basic Iranians proxy.

The only country that's hellbent on wiping Israel off the map, beyond just lip service, is Iran.

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Because the architect wanted the gap between the steps to match the depth of the steps to get a striped look, because it looks better that way, obviously.

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this kind of semantic gymnastics is what makes them so suspicious.

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

~~They removed that question from the FAQ, but it still states in multiple other sections, in the same link, that they do not sell user data~~

~~Am I reading this wrong?~~

Edit: New FAQ

Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data“), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data“ is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

view more: next ›