gofsckyourself

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, this was not a case of misunderstanding. I was just trying to figure out some sort of compromise without getting into what seems to be the main block, that is... why does it matter so much to prevent cheating that you would rather limit people's options of enjoying the game even more?

I was trying to avoid it because I am certain I'm not going to convince you to change your thinking on it. It is your game after all and if you just don't like cheating that much, then it's certainly your prerogative to make the game how you like.

I just personally don't understand. To me it seems like it shouldn't matter that much because it is a personal decision to be okay with cheating in a single-player game, since it doesn't affect others. As long as the barrier is high enough to ensure that the person is sure they are willing to take the risk of damaging their experience. At that point they only have themselves to blame if it damages their own experience. Additionally, what level/amount of "damage" would this really be? Can this damage really be so bad that it needs to be prevented at the cost of other's diminished experience? I am confident that the benefits of enhancing other people's enjoyment of the game would greatly outweigh the much lower chance of a much lower number of people who's experience might be lessened.

On top of all of that, people who play on their computer can already very easily edit their save file. While that option being available on mobile as well would be enjoyable to me, I think the ideal option would be to add a save/reload which is unlocked once you complete a win or a certain number of wins. Save/reload is a standard among many games, even roguelikes, and creates enough of a barrier to prevent it from being too easily used as a way to bypass the core difficulty that gives the game its character.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Hey there, my thoughts on it are that it’s… well… cheating. Obviously Shattered is a single player game so it’s not like cheating ruins the experience for others, but I’d rather not make it easy to do or expose any functionality within the game itself to enable people to cheat.
The main reason for this is that in most cases players are tempted to cheat as a quicker way to overcome a challenge in a game like Shattered, and by doing that they rob themselves of the satisfaction of beating the game legitimately.

I can understand making it too easy to cheat being a bad thing as it would definitely create the circumstance where, as you said, it would rob them of the experience. However, if there's enough of an effort required to do so then that makes it so that the individual is proving, at least to some extent, that they are aware of the "consequences".

Consider the idea of security. There is nothing that is truly secure, and security is just a trade-off of convenience, i.e. as you implement security you increase inconvenience and the opposite. Good security methods are ones where the trade-off is high on the security side while very low on the inconvenience side. Since there is no such thing as true security, if anyone wanted to gain access to something they absolutely can if they are willing to invest the effort, and similarly, they are proving that they are accepting the consequences.

It sounds like in your case you have already gotten legitimate wins and it’s more about mistap insurance, but there’s no way for the game to know that unfortunately.

There's already functionality of unlocking features based on progress, could this not be used to lock a save/load function and prevent your main concern? That seems like the perfect solution.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I also want to note that I went out of my way to make this post after having left lemmy due to far too many awful experiences on lemmy. I've been significantly happier not using lemmy, so I feel like I am really out on a limb just to make this post.

 

I play Shattered Pixel on my phone, and sometimes circumstances cause a mistap or similar, and with the way this game works a single bad action can mean a drastic hinderance on the run or effectively ruin large amounts of effort.

This is true for many games, and in most circumstances I can roll back to the last save and lessen the loss. While in plenty of others I can edit the save files with a shizuku-powered file manager. I had hoped that the non-google android version on github would expose the save files to shizuku, but sadly learned that was not the case. Of course, there are others where neither are an option and I just have to live with it, but I just tend to not play those games for long or that much. However, I've been playing Shattered Pixel for years. It's easily the one mobile game I have spent the most time playing. But it can really kill my desire to play for long periods of time when something happens to kill a run I was really enjoying and spent a good amount of time on and there is no way to "undo" any amount of the loss.

For me, it would be an absolute game-changer if there was some way to allow manual save/loading or access to the save files. If it means by an opt-out of online leaderboards or whatever I'm okay with that. (I'm not sure what there is for SPD, I really don't know because I only care about offline regular play.) You can mark my game a "filthy gross evil stinky dirty cheater" or something, I don't care. Personally, I don't consider it "cheating" to recoup from a mishap outside of their control in an offline singler-player game.

Is the threat of some sort of bad-actor that high that save/reload or save file access can't be considered? What exactly would be on the line by allowing "cheating"?

I have to imagine there would be a sizable enough group of people interested in manual save/load or save file access considering there are save editor tools out there, like spud. It would also allow easier transfer of game progression like this request mentions.

Is manual save/reload something that would interest others that you know of? At least, enough to get 00-Evan to consider some sort of option? Can we work out some sort of option that 00-Evan would consider?

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You're fucking insane if you even slightly think their behavior is okay. It's not a "two sides" situation in any stretch of the imagination. Just leave me alone.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I disagreed about AI, sure. Disagreements happen, not a big deal. The real issue was the fact they were assholes to me about it and making insane claims.

The reported user links to a comment you made in the Fuck_AI community [...] Seems on topic to bring that issue up.

No, not even remotely! What the fuck? That user was digging through people's history to find anything they can try to use to harass them with and resorting to straight up lies to do so. I mentioned that in the fucking post. They even posted a completely unrelated porn image in that community that explicitly forbids it. How in the fuck is any of that justification to start shit?

Holy fucking shit dbzer0 people are absolutely batshit insane.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (6 children)

If we are talking about https://lemmy.world/post/32430859/18040819

Of course we're talking about that. You fucking brought it up.

you reported a dbzer0 user, so it’s expected that the reported user’s admin would jump in.

That gives them justification to start shit about something completely off topic? Even if they had any good point, that is not the time or place.

Let's stop playing this stupid fucking game. Do you or do you not think Unruffled is in the wrong with their behavior?

If you think they are wrong, I am utterly baffled why you're still keeping this going. Otherwise, you need to fuck off.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? Show me where I mentioned dbzer0 in that thread at all.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (10 children)

It’s a forum, people are going to reply when you mention them

I was responding to this comment you made and outlining that your point was completely off the mark, since I did not mention them.

Did you really not get that? Either you whooshed yourself really hard or you're just also antagonizing me while pretending to be serious. I suspect it's the latter.

Honestly, at this point, you just need to leave me alone, too. No decent or reasonable person would support those dbzer0 anus warts, so you're most likely just trying to antagonize.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (12 children)

???

You're literally here in this thread trying to excuse Unruffled's comment there, as well as their continued harassment elsewhere. What the fuck do the LW mods have to do with you supporting them?

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (14 children)

They probably refer to this post, where you screenshotted one of their comments with a link to it

Again, how does that have anything to do with the main post or the and why is any of that excusable? Some random asshole came in with their own nonsense that had nothing to do with the main post, which is what I even said in the comment that Unruffled replied to where they just continued on those entirely off-topic antagonistic accusations.

I won't even bother diving into that thread that you are all using as justification to harass and antagonize me here and around Lemmy, or that it shows there are clearly people who agree with me there. Because, I'll say this again, it has nothing to do with the report and warning of a user that has been banned for the behavior I point out there.

I am utterly baffled that you are even willing to find some way to create a narrative where that is acceptable.

than it’s between you and the LW mods.

Right now, here in this thread, this is between me and you, and any other shitty person joining into this comment thread to support their needless attacking and harassment.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (16 children)

"complaining" is such a shitty way to describe warning and bringing attention to what is not only explicitly against the ToS of lemmy.world, but widely regarded as a shitty thing to do. Are you intentionally describing it in this way to frame me in a shitty way? I suspect so. Not to mention I was also mentioning their harassment of other users, and then myself when I called out their harassment.

Additionally, Unruffled didn't simply comment "saying they had banned the alts used for vote manipulation", they framed it as it was expected that I would or should have known that and intentionally left that information out. I don't even understand why that information matters to lemmy.world to take action. Why did they event need to make that comment at all and why did they need to phrase that so antagonisticly?

You also didn't even acknowledge the last half of their comment:

But it honestly seems a bit pathetic to be crying all over Lemmy just because someone decided to give you a taste of your own medicine for a change tbh. Especially when you and your contumelious mates go around bullying and harassing folks all the time. Don’t you have a shred of self awareness? Your behaviour is 100x more toxic than any genAI image will ever be.

What the actual fuck is this shit? What does any of this unhinged attacking have to do with the subject at all? None of this makes any sense. How in any world is that person's behavior have any connection to anything I've done? Why is any of this acceptable from anyone, let alone a fucking admin? How could you or anyone even remotely support this insanity?

Even most important now, why did you completely ignore any of this when you made this comment? You have a facade of being reasonable, but there is no excuse for supporting Unruffled or even bothering to try to explain or excuse them for this nonsense.

If anyone thinks there is any valid reason for that comment, then there was never anything that anyone could say to convince them otherwise.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

Some fresh morals and ethics would do you much better, considering you're willing to be the absolute worst kind of ""person"" just for some sort of kick. What do you even get out of being such a piece of shit? Do you want other people to feel as bad as you do about yourself? (I don't actually want an answer. I want you to leave me the fuck alone.)

 

It has become apparent that @rodneyck@lemmy.world has been manipulating votes by voting with multiple accounts on other instances.

At the very least, on this post they have upvoted it using multiple accounts with the same username on different instances, as well as multiple votes in the comments of that post. It's very likely they are doing the same on all their posts.

They are also harassing other users by digging up comments/posts then lying about them in order to slander the other person.

The comment chain on this thread shows this behavior:
https://lemmy.world/post/32414918/18033196
(Note that there is an unmarked NSFW image from that user in the comments. This was used as an attempt to harass another user.)

-- Edit --
@rodneyck@lemmy.dbzer0.com is now here with some pathetic spin and conspiracy bullshit. They are trying to act like a victim like the whole issue has to do with AI when it's entirely about them harassing users and a painfully obvious use of alts for manipulation. They even went so far as to post a porn image, in an attempt to harass another user, in a comm that has a clear rule against posting porn. The problems with this user has nothing to do with their sad use of AI.

@DeezDohNutz@lemmy.ml is clearly another alt of their's. Not only did they never post anything until now and show up here at nearly the same time and use the same phrasing and ridiculous arguments, notice how they have the same exact text in their user bio.

Here is DeezDohNutz@lemmy.ml:

And rodneyck@lemmy.dbzer0.com:

This is just sad.

 

Edited version of this meme

 
 
 

~~They will also delete any comments that complain about AI at all, even though there is no rule against it.~~

/--edit--/
After second look, that's not entirely true, but they definitely have a trigger finger for it and leave plenty of other "off-topic" comments.

Considering the amount of posts deleted, it should have just been locked instead of nuking comments with a negative view of AI

Here's the thread in the screenshot:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43426671/18476015

Also, here you can see other's seem to think this was an attempt to silence dissent (though, I don't think that this coming from drag is a great point for it):
https://lemmy.ca/post/43313594

/--/

Just look at this completely insane comment from an instance admin:

11
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by gofsckyourself@lemmy.world to c/support@lemm.ee
 

I got a DM from a brand new user created on lemm.ee that is using my username. The DM came through at 3 minutes and 10 seconds of the account being created.

 
 
 

I would greatly like to be able to filter posts that link to certain domains.

For example, I want to filter all posts that link to the gamingonlinux website, because the owner of that website sucks and I find that site to be overall useless.

 

I guess that this 50501 movement has somehow gained some recent popularity from somewhere, but the sheer volume of content, communities, and even instances seems weird.

Where did this all come from and why did it seem to come as a sudden flood?

view more: next ›