He's saying some nice words, but I don't have the confidence that Hunter would actually deliver on those words. I can see the democratic party deceptively changing their messaging to be anti-establishment while still carrying out the will of the establishment through their actions. In fact, they already did that reluctantly when Barack "Hope and Change" Obama jumped onto the scene and carried the zeitgeist. He said many nice things that meshed well with the popular sentiment, but in the end just largely did what the establishment wanted, counter to that popular sentiment. Then the party completely shut down that rhetoric when they doubled down on Hillary "Her Turn" Clinton after. It shows just how stubborn the party is in wanting to keep the status quo that they couldn't even keep the messaging of hope and change going.
The most concerning part is when he said that people want to be led. This is the kind of thinking that makes politicians feel justified in overriding what people want. Politicians are civil servants, not leaders, they should be carrying out the will of the people. This tells me he may listen to what people want, but ultimately he will make decisions based on what he'd prefer as "leader".

He said "I'm not running for office. But if I were[...]". If he can entertain what-ifs then so can I, especially when it's the what-if he brought up himself and I'm speaking directly about that what-if.