kbotc

joined 2 years ago
[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I saw an ad request with an inline 1.4 MB game. Like, you could fit Mario in there.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Which makes it all the more Pooh-esque.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Throw in some misspellings and I would have sworn it was Winnie the Pooh.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, he can be questioned about official acts. The wording is that the judiciary decides what is an official act, so if they decide it is, he cannot be punished criminally for what is otherwise a criminal act. The Supreme Court did a bunch of power grabs for itself and effectively declared that Congress couldn’t do squat other than impeachment against the president and the only check on the president’s power was whether the judiciary agreed with him.

Now Trump’s attacking the judiciary and has made the chief justice have to make a statement that his challenges to his legitimacy will not stand, so I would expect to see a bunch of cases go against Trump just as a judiciary show of force, much like his citizenship emergency challenge where they told him to fuck off and they’d slow walk his case.

Trump could have ended democracy quite easily if he wasn’t in such a damn hurry to get shit done and snubbing all of the power brokers that he needs to implement his plans is forcing a bunch of needless shit. When the economy is fully in shambles in a few months and the ad spend slows down for media companies, I’d expect them to pounce on how much shit he fucked up. It’s wild seeing WSJ realizing the problem that’s coming down the pipeline and the Murdoch rag shitting on him in the editorials rather than WaPo.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

ICE has been arresting people at green card interviews.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Like you live in an open world RPG and the generated quests have a place to show up

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Let me stop you here: You seem to lack the pre-requisite knowledge of laws, and the understanding of what HR departments and DEI departments do.

What you’re describing is absolutely, totally, illegal and has been since the 1970s. This was decided in Griggs v Duke Power Co. The phrase you can look up is “Disparate impact” and in particular the “adverse impact” and tests.

DEI has big problems, but most of them stem from businesses just slapping in a 60 minute micro aggression course from a third party service and calling it done

https://hbr.org/2022/12/the-failure-of-the-dei-industrial-complex

What DEI is supposed to do is stuff like:

For example, a purposeless unconscious bias training required for all employees is almost certainly less effective than an unconscious bias training deployed specifically for decision-makers like hiring managers or supervisors, to increase their familiarity with newly implemented bias-interrupting practices like hiring panels and scoring rubrics after an audit found evidence of bias in hiring and promotion processes.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

But Italians eat dried pasta… lots of it.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Regulatory capture would be my obvious. When businesses use the regulatory body that is supposed to regulate them to destroy any competition by making it so onerous to follow the regulations that unless you set up your business before the regulations were put into place, you can’t hope to enter the market, and then abuse consumers and the environment.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I got an argument about this particular one. They don’t seem to understand that there’s a difference between being malnourished leading to having a vitamin A deficiency causing immune system issues, and vaccines. They’re reading a study from more than a century going that fixing malnutrition lowered the death rate of measles and take a “If fixing vitamin A deficiency reduced deaths, you can just macro dose it and cure measles!” Which is absolutely stupid and did not pan out in future research and is, in fact, dangerous as well.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why do you think that piece is saying? I read through it and can’t figure it out other than misdirected anger.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

From what we saw in the Canadian teen: It’s only a mutation away from ripping through humans in a real bad way. It picked up the mutation it needed to switch from preferring the alpha 2,3 receptor plentiful in birds to the alpha 2,6 sialic acids that are plentiful in the human nose, throat and lungs when the teen was infected. That teen then developed ARDS and she needed to be intubated.

view more: next ›