kutt

joined 16 hours ago
[–] kutt@lemmy.world 6 points 43 minutes ago

Your data is more valuable to them than water and energy

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago

Very convenient indeed... and did I mention that the cameras didn't work that day?

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yes they will probably never replace them because they’re actually slower than classical computers in doing simple calculations.

Quantum ML is actively being researched. However I am not informed at all about the advancement in this field specifically.

But the good news is that it doesn’t need to be portable, we can use them just as we do right now with remote access!

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Oh I'm not saying it is technically impossible, it's the opposite actually, it's developing extremely fast. And usefulness and having QCs in our homes aren't that far apart to be honest. Why would John Doe have a QC at home if he's not trying to create a new medication, or simulate a molecule? Probably for the same reasons he doesn't have an MRI machine in his living room :)

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah but you have to consider one other thing. Before creating classical computers, we already had theorized them, we had algorithms etc. We knew why we were creating them.

For QC, the pace of hardware development is faster than our ability to create algorithms. It's very similar to what's happening with the AI bubble currently, we're investing heavily in a new technology because it looks cool to investors, but we don't even have enough algorithms to run on it. It's just a shit ton of marketing...

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] kutt@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

I don’t think it will ever reach consumer households, since it requires extremely complex and expensive materials, tools and physical conditions. Unless a major breakthrough occurs but highly unlikely.

Also we don’t really have a use for them, at least to regular users. They won’t replace classical computers.

But you can already access some QCs online. IBM has a paid remote API for instance.

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Or keep auto-upvote on because you agree with yourself. If you get proven wrong you can downvote your own post!

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Yes yes yes that’d be perfect, at least EU-wide

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

TIL you can sign NDAs for divorces

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It still works for me. I can only see the comments on the post since it was deleted, but that’s what’s important here.

OP’s last message

Scary Comment 1

Scary Comment 2

view more: next ›