[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

It was like six months ago. The first videos from him that I saw were the ones about Sony Trinitron TVs. That was a few years ago.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

He's in there getting ripped on his Bowflex

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Off-site backup is the proper answer to your question. All this really depends on your own tolerance or comfort with the possibility of losing data. The rule of thumb is that there should be at least three different copies of your data, each in a different physical location. For each of them, there should be redundancy of some kind implemented to guard against hardware failure. Redundancy is typically achieved by using mirrored drives or by using RAID of some kind. Also, if you'd like to know, using RAID in which you can only lose one disk in the array is not typically considered a sufficient level of protection because of the possibility of a cascading drive failure during replacement of a failed disk. It should be at least two.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

When you're coming off of a lifetime of anything being able to be smoothed over given enough money and power, it's hard to imagine an alternative.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

If it's a spam call, that let's them know that the number is active. They'll keep calling if you do that.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

I'm 95% certain I've said y'all'd've before unironically.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

That's an interesting complaint. Is ubiquity necessarily bad?

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

"pickup truck" is the term that refers to them. It's pretty unambiguous I think.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

I acknowledge your existence

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Nah they're those little skewers used to hold the burger together. Might work ok as a toothpick though.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

In my experience, this is intentional. You're watching a thing with full dynamic range sound. Honestly, the intention is for you to have a decent speaker system and to turn it up so you can hear the dialog comfortably. The loud parts will be loud and that is the intent. Why would they make the loud parts quiet? An explosion isn't supposed to be quiet. They shouldn't make it quiet for the sake of you listening to it through your TV's built in speakers at 2 in the morning while the rest of the house is asleep. If you need the dynamic range to be compressed for your purposes you can do that yourself. Many devices have this option these days. My Roku has "leveling" and "night" modes which compress the dynamic range so there's not such a difference between the quiet parts and the loud parts.

[-] lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It was a freak occurrence. I hesitate to call it an accident because the pig is probably not incontinent.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

lazyslacker

joined 1 year ago