Yep, and the best way to make sure these places keep going is to contribute!
Also, if you can, consider donating to instance/server hosts and developers.
lightingnerd
joined 2 years ago
I used the tip of a specialized tooth-brush, and I dipped it into water and then swiped-up spores from the sample. I wouldn't recommend it though, because it turns out the brush fibers are too stiff and caught on the agar, pulling the plate around. It's probably better just to stick to swabs and use the same method.
Side thought: a lot of people recommend the z-shape swabbing, but it seems kind-of counterproductive if you're trying to select for the apparent speed and strength of mycelium growth.
Not to mention the periodic spore clouds, haha! It would be really cool if it were possible though!
I wonder if it would be possible to get some radiotrophic fungi to absorb IR and UV, so they could functionally act as a thermal barrier, cooling during the summer and heating during the winter...
Well, for a redneck FFU I would probably just be shooting from the hip--because I'd be building the fan from scratch--meaning it would be easier to build then measure the airflow rate of the custom fan, and then modify the design of the fan or modify the filter size until I get something good.
As far as resources, this seems to be on-point if you want to just buy the parts outright in a less redneck manner: https://learn.freshcap.com/growing/keeping-it-clean-how-to-design-and-build-a-laminar-flow-hood/
Nice! Yeah, I mostly want it for convenience of working with agar--but the need just isn't there yet. I'm considering a redneck version using one of the 4" thick MERV 12 filters, which are rated to filter 0.3um particles, just not 99.99% of them. I know for a fact it would be much better than my SAB in terms of contamination risk, and I'm considering building my own wooden impeller fan, so if I can scrap an old high RPM motor--I may be able to finagle a basic FFU together for under $50.
True, it's always good to verify with academic articles. I'd never trust ChatGPT without also verifying with sources--if for no other reason than its training dataset was cutoff in 2021. It's generally good to seek out research that is less than 3-5 years old when possible, due to how quickly the scientific landscape changes. According to this particular article from 2019, ChatGPT's response was pretty accurate.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejlt.201900101
I love this thing that people forget about open source. Like the whole FreeCAD community, there's a whole group of people who don't even use the vanilla UI--because they don't have to, haha! Of course, it does take skill, but if you're skilled enough to make pull request...
Yeah, I'm a Reddit refugee, and I heard a bunch of people complaining about there being no "centralized login", and I'm like--bruh, that's WHY WE MOVED HERE, lmao!
Thanks for the recommendation, I just finished watching it--and yeah that speaks volumes (quite literally, haha!). I love how they started off the episode with a very fluent mixture of non-English and a few English phrases.
I should really go back and revisit TNG! I remember watching it as a kid, but now that I have a few decades under my belt, I've gone back and watched a few episodes: and it really is packed with amazing philosophy and social commentary.
Indeed, indeed! Diversity is one of the strongest traits of human life (and life in-general).
I don't recall that episode, I'll have to go watch it!
Vlad is just a global embarrassment at this point.
Oh, that's a great idea! I'm clearly new to mycology, so I'm just kind-of experimenting--but you're right, we're talking billions of spores, and only two need to meet in order to form a strain. Hmm...