machiabelly

joined 4 years ago
[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 34 points 4 weeks ago

The Nazi belief that if you don't approve of our genocide it must mean you want to genocide us.

No we cannot just stop doing genocide its clearly us or them! People of different religions or ethnicities can never live together!

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 30 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I pay my grad students with thank you letters!

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think this is depicting the bombing as bringing peace

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

NERVous breakdown kelly

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Maybe I'm idealistic but I think that people would be horrified. A lot of Americans would brush it off and forget about it but I think that it would cause permanent damage to America's perception in the world and in foreign relations. I've heard people say that the WW2 nukes were or weren't justified, but never that they don't care. I'm sure those people are out there but the perception of those nukes comes across very differently because it was the first use of atomic weapons, and because that war is and was seen as justified. I don't think that this war will be seen as being justified to the same extent.

Human beings aren't rational. The same way that 12 people dying from systemic, indirect, capitalist violence doesn't pull the heartstrings like a shooting does, the dropping of an atomic bomb, seen fucking live and filmed from 10,000 different angles will hit people in places they didn't know they had. Of course many will cheer it, and many won't care. But I think, that this will damage the US' reputation more than supporting the genocide did/does.

I believe that if the US nukes Iran, it will be remembered as the day the US empire fell, or at least the beginning of the end. There are lines that can't be crossed, points of no return, and while genociding brown people is not one of them, dropping a nuke is. Its an upsetting of the order, a permanent mistrust and wariness that will follow the US for a century.

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because its the next big thing, and its still cheaper than cycling, motorsports, traveling, eating out, fashion, wargaming, many types of art, and a lot of other activities. Also, the release got delayed and has been anticipated for a long time, so people have had the chance to save for it.

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago (9 children)

They've actually produced a ton of units. Its one of the most successful console launches ever. Like, 3m in a week or something.

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ottomans took a slow decline over centuries after institutions based on constant expansion failed.

British were unable to maintain all their colonies after WW2.

Assyrians were too brutal and it made them unstable.

Achaeminids were outclassed in terms of military theory, tactics, and equipment

A bunch more due to famine.

Incans and aztecs from smallpox.

No powerful state at their apex fell from anything other than military defeat, unsustainable institutions, catastrophy, or poor leadership.

Internal dissent can overcome a weak state, but not a strong one, at least not without support from foreign powers.

It doesn't mean that internal dissent is useless, just that it won't be the biggest factor in decline.

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

I did a pedagogy of the oppressed book group at the local DSA with my boomer aunt. She's cool too

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 45 points 1 month ago (6 children)

What percentage of liberals are going to blame this on the protestors?

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Which one did it for you?

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

Legume systems research sounds like one of the most worthwhile things you could possibly research.

Extremely nutritious crop that nourishes soil? Nah, definitely not worth researching for literal pennies on the US budget

 

yes lets ignore literally all historical evidence and just go based on vibes

 

English language media and the mexican FA says its a homophobic slur. Buuuut spanish media says it more just means "bitch." Anyone here know if its actually a slur used against queer people? Preferably a Mexican comrade. Whats the deeaaalll

 

Vanilla feels so limiting and there are so many mods you need just to make it passable. Any way to make it so that I don't have to be like mayor pete?

 

Can we confidently say that gerrymandering gives this many seats to this party? Or is it super convoluted? Is as much of a big deal as I remember it being in my high school gov class?

 

It's one of the most common lefty talking points I see around but I was wondering what the best historical knowledge we have on the topic is. Any cool videos or articles you'd recommend?

view more: ‹ prev next ›