mat

joined 2 years ago
[–] mat@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] mat@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago

I guess I will try with a k3s on my workstation, but for a single NAS, I am not sure any kubernetes distribution is useful for now :)

[–] mat@jlai.lu 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Tu vas changer ou leur en parler ? Ce doit être un peu agaçant, non ?

[–] mat@jlai.lu 2 points 6 hours ago

What kind of annoying things are you dealing with?

Troubleshooting with a machinectl session, switching between services, backing up... It is small annoyances but if I can avoid them i'd like it.

You don't have to put the user home in /var/lib either if that helps at all.

I half regret doing it.

If you're already running rootless, I'd keep doing that unless there's a really good reason not to.

The plan is about switching to a single user, I will stick to rootless podman this is for sure. It is more about dedicated users or a single one.

[–] mat@jlai.lu 2 points 7 hours ago

I guess I should define my threat model first. Your answer pulls me towards a single user though

[–] mat@jlai.lu 1 points 7 hours ago

I am already running rootless podman. My question is more about dedicated service users vs single user to run everything, still in rootless podman. I like podman and its integration with systemd to manage the life cycle of the container compared to docker.

 

Cross-posted from "Dedicated service user or not ?" by @mat@jlai.lu in !selfhosted@lemmy.world


Hi all !

As of today, I am running my services with rootless podman pods and containers. Each functional stack gets its dedicated user (user cloud runs a pod with nextcloud-fpm, nginx, postgresql...) with user mapping. Now, my thought were that if an attack can escape a container, it should be contained to a specific user.

Is it really meaningful ? With service users' home setup in /var/lib, it makes a lot of small stuff annoying and I wonder if the current setup is really worth it ?

 

Cross-posted from "Dedicated service user or not ?" by @mat@jlai.lu in !selfhosted@lemmy.world


Hi all !

As of today, I am running my services with rootless podman pods and containers. Each functional stack gets its dedicated user (user cloud runs a pod with nextcloud-fpm, nginx, postgresql...) with user mapping. Now, my thought were that if an attack can escape a container, it should be contained to a specific user.

Is it really meaningful ? With service users' home setup in /var/lib, it makes a lot of small stuff annoying and I wonder if the current setup is really worth it ?

 

Cross-posted from "Dedicated service user or not ?" by @mat@jlai.lu in !selfhosted@lemmy.world


Hi all !

As of today, I am running my services with rootless podman pods and containers. Each functional stack gets its dedicated user (user cloud runs a pod with nextcloud-fpm, nginx, postgresql...) with user mapping. Now, my thought were that if an attack can escape a container, it should be contained to a specific user.

Is it really meaningful ? With service users' home setup in /var/lib, it makes a lot of small stuff annoying and I wonder if the current setup is really worth it ?

 

Hi all !

As of today, I am running my services with rootless podman pods and containers. Each functional stack gets its dedicated user (user cloud runs a pod with nextcloud-fpm, nginx, postgresql...) with user mapping. Now, my thought were that if an attack can escape a container, it should be contained to a specific user.

Is it really meaningful ? With service users' home setup in /var/lib, it makes a lot of small stuff annoying and I wonder if the current setup is really worth it ?

[–] mat@jlai.lu 5 points 8 hours ago

AMD technologies for nvidia... sad

[–] mat@jlai.lu 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's be free by opressing other countries, where have I seen it? Especially with nuclear weapons. We should be spending less on military and private sector, and more on public education, healthcare and social safety at large. He is a moronic shitty wannabe warlord and I despise him with all my heart.

[–] mat@jlai.lu -4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, Trump is obviously better. But I am not a USan soi don't really give a shot about USan internal politic

[–] mat@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I used KDE plasma, GNOME or sway ans I would say chat unless you have a config set up on a private device. Windows is like KDE but without any customization, Gnome is MacOS like. In the end, I have VSCodium, Pycharm or Helix as text editor, Firefox as a web browser and my dependencies usually run in docker so this setup could be applied to windows or MacOS but I would not be able to troubleshoot anything in case of desktop issue.

[–] mat@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago

I guess why not. The choice of Xlibre seems properly explained, but if Xorg developers went to Wayland, I'd say there is a reason but I don't how Wayland is on Solaris descendants. And at least they acknowledge that they know nothing in politics (they seem US based so they can't receive Iranian or Cuban contributions as it happened to OSM recently)

[–] mat@jlai.lu 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Application rigoureuse du RGPD pour leur sous-titrer plein de thunes ?

14
Bun Hay Mean est mort (fr.m.wikipedia.org)
 

Cross-posted from "Rise Of The Northstar - Neo Paris" by @eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz in !metal@lemmy.world


 

As the title says. I put the wrong value inside a clean up code and I wiped everything. I did not push any important work. I just want to cry but at least I can offer it to you.

Do not hesitate to push even if your project is in a broken state.

 

La vidéo est assez intéressante pour avoir des petites villes sur comment virer les ricains.

view more: next ›