Why not having guns and being for the ban ?
menas
joined 2 years ago
Well, we can't deny that the silencing the opposition (like wokists) help to maintain a slavery society. So both are actually right. But one is a shitty fascist
There is some, but not the most part :
The Message Bible 3 No other gods, only me.
Knowing which some is the most accurate is a multi millennium debate, with not clear answer. Shall digging in ?
No I think not. But the feeling of freewill do exist and seems universal. So if we have a fact based approach, it does not change much. I think there it a lot of proof that freewill is at least very weak compare to social determinism.
Free stuff is cool though
I just know Gundam 00 and Witches from mercury; I think it match
I'm no priest, I blame no one; I point causes. In an unequal system (capitalism), there is not the same responsibility depending of our power on the mean of production. The representation that picture fascism of the unions or anti-racist collectives exists, but are marginal. Mass media like in Hollywood, mainstream comics or how History is presented on TV has way more impact. I'm not saying that the bourgeoisie is more or less fascists than other classes. I'm saying that in letting their in command, we let their point view and biaises shape our representations. No judgement their, just description.
We could go further, and say the most someone is close to the ruling class, the less someone will met contradictions.
Bourgeoisie has depicted fasciscts as vilains, evil and monstruous. Now when people discovered that nazis are just humans, their are surprised. Spoiler: people could act nice, honest, and even involve in charity, and still aim to enslave or mass kill others.
Lots of neurodivergent and antifascists, and sureley around your place. Not being a fascists scum make you already priceless. Maybe their is some collective that could help you to get some distance, or at least have some break. Antifa orga, unions, sportive association, neighborhood association ... Solidarity comrade.
Again, you need to source. To one of those example evolve in hierarchical organization. If you claim is "no organization could exist with total equality", we do agree. But we could say the same with communism, or even democracy. We need to be materialist, and tend to equality and freedom. And privileges tend te reproduce through time
So it's a fascist state, which include a support of it's population through nationalism. It doesn't change anything that this nationalism is based on a religion, regional or cultural identity. It's work the same.
Speaking about all the population is cutting ourselves from the ally we have in the 15%. We couldn't say "it's over, we couldn't do anything for those left"; we are the 15% in our own imperialist state. And if you think that this is a different situation, there were German resistance during WW2 ... and they almost kill hitler.
Even if you disagree, why speaking about Jewish people and not just Israeli people ? You just insulting every Jews that choose do not live in Israel. A choice you didn't make.