miz

joined 11 months ago
[–] miz@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

whom amongst us

[–] miz@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago

The elites realized they don't need a prosperous and happy populace, that's expensive.

they realized it in 1992

[–] miz@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

an honest US flag would be that Abu Ghraib picture of a hooded detainee standing on a box with electrical wires attached to him

[–] miz@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

If you take away a white person’s ability to live as the undisputed master of the universe—to take his own experience as normal and privileged, and to presume all others to be debased copies of his own primary existence—then you take away his whiteness.

from Buffalo Skulls

[–] miz@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

IN A WORLD...

[–] miz@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yeah it was this Eric Posner article in Politico iirc

Editor’s note: This article, and particularly its original headline (“What If You Could Get Your Own Immigrant?”), was offensive to many readers. We changed the headline on Tuesday night to better reflect the authors’ intent, and asked them to respond to the criticism, but they declined. POLITICO Magazine has always been a platform for a wide range of views, and we do not endorse the opinions expressed in any article we publish.

What If You Could Get Your Own Immigrant?

JB-shining-aggro

[–] miz@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago

this but unironically

[–] miz@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

took me a while to figure out you weren't talking about veterinarians

[–] miz@hexbear.net 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"40 beheaded babies jack, I saw them. they were crawling on my ceiling"

biden-alert

[–] miz@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

the democrats already did this during the 2020 cycle, they even photoshopped out the PSL signs

[–] miz@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

this will definitely win over some billionaires and only turn off some thousands of dirty socialist supporters, good trade

[–] miz@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
 

this story was spiked by Middle East Eye at the last minute (Qatari funded iirc)

 

anything can be an emoji if you bookmark it with some keywords

 
 
 

Since 2020, states and municipalities across the country have amassed a portfolio of $1.7 billion in "Israel" Bonds—securities sold by the "state" of "Israel" to “strengthen every aspect of "Israel's" economy, enabling national infrastructure development.” Since October 7th, 2023, $580 million of state and municipal investments have been invested in "Israeli" bonds.

In some cases, the state treasurers and comptrollers that purchased "Israeli" bonds are the very same officials who pushed for laws in their states against investing in firms that embrace environmental social governance (ESG), or investments based, at least superficially, on diversity, climate change, or any other criteria they deem “woke.” Their argument: If a firm makes politically motivated investment decisions in accordance with ESG, then the firm has compromised its fiduciary duty to be a good steward of dollars and maximize returns for investors.

Were the "Israel" Bonds a secure investment, with growth fueled by regional war? No. In fact, they are rapidly losing value, earning a 20% lower return than when they were initially purchased just one year ago.

And it’s only going to get worse. Both S&P and Moody’s lowered "Israel’s" credit rating twice this year. Last October, "Israel" Bonds had a fixed rate of 5.74 to 5.96%, according to releases by state treasurers’ offices. The current rate for those same 3-year bonds now falls between 4.38-4.6%.

Yet many of the state treasurers and comptrollers across the U.S. who bought the bonds are unfazed. They invested not for the high returns, but, as Palm Beach County Clerk Joseph Abruzzo put it, because "Israel" is “our greatest ally” and “needs this money.”

 

"Israel’s" military has determined that the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to issue arrest warrants against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister could put military officials and soldiers at risk of legal action while abroad, according to a report by Ynet citing army sources.

The decision could affect mandatory service and reserve soldiers who participated in Tel Aviv’s genocidal war against the Gaza Strip.

“Some soldiers have already been required to leave countries they visited due to concerns about legal proceedings,” the "Israeli" news site said on 4 December.

According to the report, the "Israeli" army has identified around 30 cases in which its soldiers faced legal proceedings while visiting certain countries. At least eight "Israeli" soldiers were forced to leave the countries they were visiting, such as Cyprus, Slovenia, and the Netherlands.

The "Israeli" army has warned dozens of soldiers to avoid traveling abroad.

The army has not imposed a full travel ban on its members, but is carrying out a “risk assessment” process for soldiers who wish to travel.

Scores of "Israeli" army soldiers have, since the war in Gaza began, posted footage of themselves online making genocidal statements, destroying homes, ordering mass evacuations, or committing various forms of war crimes. Many of these testimonies were used as evidence in South Africa’s genocide case against "Israel" at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) earlier this year.

The report added that many pro-Palestinian organizations have used this material to create “blacklists” of "Israeli" army soldiers, publishing their names and photos, “hoping to identify future travel plans.” They then filed legal complaints or submitted petitions to authorities in the aforementioned countries.

“Individual proceedings against soldiers and junior officers traveling abroad could be based on ICC rulings. To any soldier or officer, if they are arrested, summoned for questioning, or feel they are being followed or photographed while abroad, "Israel" will provide immediate legal assistance through its local embassy or the Foreign Ministry’s situation room,” the army said.

“In non-ICC member countries such as the US, China, or India, there is local legislation governing the law of war. These nations are not obligated to act on ICC arrest warrants, but local laws could still pose risks,” it added.

Tel Aviv has hired legal experts to “monitor changes in legislation” in dozens of countries, Ynet reported.

“These lawyers track legal activity against "Israelis" and, if needed, represent soldiers and officers in those countries,” the daily added.

Chief Prosecutor of the ICC Karim Khan announced in late May that the court had applied for arrest warrants against Netanyahu and his former defense minister Yoav Gallant. The applications also included warrants for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Mohammad Deif. The arrest warrants against the two "Israeli" officials were then issued by the ICC on 21 November.

Washington has rejected the ICC decision and previously vowed to take action against the court.

“The US has been clear that the ICC does not have jurisdiction over this matter. In coordination with partners, including "Israel", we are discussing next steps,” a US National Security Council spokesperson told reporters.

 

May 20, 2020

Leaked phone conversations between Joe Biden and then-Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko have been made public by a Ukrainian lawmaker.

Edited recordings of the calls were played at a news conference Tuesday in Kiev by Andriy Derkach, who has claimed he has proof showing that Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian natural gas company that employed Biden’s son Hunter Biden, paid then-Vice President Joe Biden $900,000 in lobbying fees.

 

Communications director Zorus Merlin (Branson) and data scientist and consultant Sean Seaside (Charles) assign accountability for the Democrats' electoral loss and raise money for the Kamala Harris presidential campaign to pay off its debts.

view more: ‹ prev next ›