3
submitted 2 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/doommetal@lemmy.world
3
submitted 2 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/metal@lemmy.world
9
submitted 2 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/doommetal@lemmy.world
8
submitted 2 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/metal@lemmy.world
13
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by mrh@mander.xyz to c/doommetal@lemmy.world
11
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/metal@lemmy.world
10
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/doommetal@lemmy.world
9
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/metal@lemmy.world
4
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/metal@lemmy.world
2
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/doommetal@lemmy.world
6
Mansion - Sword of God [FI, 2023] (weshalllive.bandcamp.com)
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/doommetal@lemmy.world
15
submitted 3 months ago by mrh@mander.xyz to c/metal@lemmy.world
[-] mrh@mander.xyz 34 points 3 months ago

Lisp

It solves so many problems new languages have been invented to try and solve, while being simultaneously simpler than most

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago
[-] mrh@mander.xyz 11 points 4 months ago
[-] mrh@mander.xyz 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

codeberg

it’s like github but non-corporate free software

it’s very polished and featurful

it’s built upon/by the same devs as forgejo, which is open tech to self host your own git server (with federation potentially coming), so supporting one supports the other

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If I understand you correctly, this is trivial in emacs:

(defun insert-text ()
  (interactive)
  (insert "your text here"))

(global-set-key your-keybind-here #'insert-text)

You could make it a format string if it relies on data specific to some file or parameter. You could also make the keybind local to certain modes/files rather than a global keybind if you don't want to pollute your keybind space.

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 37 points 6 months ago

emacs org-mode

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

edit: I do feel norawibb's point, the slippery mutability of Void is something I am a lot less comfortable with than I used to be. Apparently Guix has spoiled me.

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are two different immutable OS models hot on the table in the linux space I see: The Nix[^1] way and the Silverblue[^2] way.

Both have immutable filesystems which deviate from the FHS, provide atomic updates, and support the creation of more-or-less isolated environments at the user level. But the way the two models implement these features is very different.

The Nix way takes inspiration from the world of functional programming, while the Silverblue way takes inspiration from the containerized, cloud native technologies which are used so widely in the industry.

I believe the idea that these two approaches share is the future of linux on both the server and the desktop, and it is only a matter of time before some (if not all) of these advantages become mainstream. However, I am uncertain of which approach is superior.

I have personal experience with Guix and enjoyed it greatly and even recommend others try it or Nix out for themselves, but there are some complexity issues. It is not clear to me whether these issues are growing pains, or symptoms of a fundamentally overcomplicated system to solve a seemingly simpler problem.

The Silverblue way I have no experience with, but seems like a more grounded approach to tackling the specific problems laid out. The big area where Silverblue seems to lack in comparison to Nix/Guix is declarative, reproducible system configuration. With Nix/Guix you can just throw your system config file up in a repo, and anybody else can pull it down and install that system bit-for-bit, including future you! With home manager this extends to a large extent to user configuration as well. Of course with Silverblue you can create images, but that is less straightforward and powerful (at least for now).

What are ya'll's thoughts on immutable OS's?

[^1]: The only other example I am aware of is Guix, which imo is the superior implementation, but it is newer and less popular. [^2]: Others include openSUSE's MircoOS/Aeon and Vanilla OS.

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is patently false. Most alternatives to GNU software are permissively licensed (MIT, BSD, Apache, etc.). Just look at musl, clang, bzip2, and the various “new” userland replacements like ripgrep, neovim, bat, exa, dust, etc. The one notable exception is busybox which is GPL 2.

I don’t know why this trend exists, but I am constantly disappointed that talented young open source devs choose to sacrifice software freedom just because it will make their software easier to integrate in proprietary contexts. This strikes me as pure vanity or greed on the devs part so that their software is more popular and maybe even monetizable.

I hope that trend halts, but time will tell.

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

what would you be stealing?

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lemmy has certainly already won me over reddit. Going back to centralized social media is something I will actively avoid if at all possible.

However I believe nostr is a theoretically better protocol than activitypub. Having your account/identity tied so strongly to a particular instance is undesirable. As soon as there is a reddit-like (or even forum-like) client for nostr which is relatively active/polished, I will switch. Nip 172 can't come soon enough.

In addition to being less popular / newer than activitypub, nostr is also full of bitcoin[^1] bros and twitter refugees (not my crowd). But frankly I think complaints about that are like the complaints that lemmy is a place for tankies a couple years ago when people's only exposure was to a (much smaller than today) lemmy.ml.

[^1]: monero support would be nice though...

[-] mrh@mander.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

Alternatively if price is an issue (NEVER use a “free” VPN) you could torrent over I2P, which is free and very safe (at least as safe as tor, if not moreso).

Also the next release of qbittorrent is about to have built in I2P support (but also standard I2P comes with its own torrenting software).

view more: next ›

mrh

joined 1 year ago