nephs

É, a thumb não carregou. D:

I vote comrade Yogthos.

Thank you for your words, really.

I didn't claim a genocide on the disabled isn't happening. It was a stupid terminology question that is proven absurd through the experience of a person closer to the matter.

Obrigado pelos 30m de atenção. :)

Eu acho que estar errado publicamente tem algum valor. Porque nem todo mundo está na vanguarda da teoria o tempo todo. E pra chegar lá tem 200 anos de teoria.

Talvez algum nível de desvio vindo de discussões geralmente razoáveis ajude a apresentar mais da nossa linha, por contraste, pra quem tende a se alinhar naturalmente com a esquerda não radical.

O feminismo também tem seus desvios, vide radfem. Mesmo a pauta trans também é contaminada pelos liberais, e acho que ambos desvios afastam as pessoas da nossa linha pela linha, como efeito colateral. Acho que ele foi pela linha errada de análise, mas há um ponto sobre a linguagem não ser sempre a contradição principal, e que sublinhar esse ponto acaba afastando pessoas que poderiam se alinhar a nós politicamente, por tirá-los o interesse por conta dos seus preconceitos que poderiam ser superados, de outra forma.

I wrote a lot, and it's very confusing. It might not deserve an answer, but I though sending it through was better than silence. So, for posterity, there it is.

I don't understand it myself. It's a subject I'm not comfortable with, I don't know how to speak about it. I apologise.

I was thinking the case about abnormalities detectable through genetics. Namely down syndrome, and the eugenics argument around it. That's the relationship I had in mind when I opened the thread.

I suppose there's cases for other abnormalities, where early diagnostics could exist? And then, when parents could suffer pression to abort the pregnancy.

So... These wouldn't be cases for slave labour, but one could argue that if this is provided and available, there would be some social pressure for these to happen, therefore this could be one form of genocide of the disabled?

Also, the case for the ageing population. Encouraging euthanasia, like Canada is trying to pass (has passed?) laws to enable it, when the family can't support the disabilities naturally occurring through age.

I'm not sure what the question is. I think I just wanted more material to get more familiar with the topic and the discussions around it.

Maybe the question is, if we theoretically prevent "all" disabilities through all means, is this genocide of the disabled? I think the concept of genocide of the disabled confuses me.

You touch "genocide of the disabled". This is an area I don't understand deeply, so please forgive my ignorance.

Can you expand on it, or give me some sources, please?

Isn't a society practicing "from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs" going to provide enough support to the disabled so that they become "enabled", in some shape or form? Wouldn't such society try to discuss and prevent such conditions to the extent of reasonability?

Or course, it feels fair to support anyone, with whatever their wrapping society can provide, and to prepare to provide the most, but. Isn't preventing physical and mental hardship part of that, too?

Have you worked with entr?

It generalises watch modes. I can see a setup with tmux and entr to kick-start builds in watch mode, and whatever your neovim stuff is.

👍

Is what I learned with fallout. Or something.

Yeah, when there's aliens news I always ask myself "okay, where they don't want us to be discussing, now?"

I don't know what that is, this time. Anything Ukraine or Israel?

What a beautiful sum up, comrade. 🫡

There's a new expansion pack for factorio. Factorio is not for everyone, but whoever gets it gets a cheap per hour entertainment.

Could there be a "I'm well paid here, but I'm not going to actually fight for this shitty state" thing going on?