orioler25

Strange, all the Bros told me that less demand = cheaper...but everything still get more expensive....🧐

Turns out speculative value is made up.

You all know what that means, your MPP's are back home. Go pay them a visit and let them know how you feel about tenant rights violations and erosion of public services.

No, and you're ignorant or of poor character if you do. The Canadian state is not your ally, it operates in the interest of capital and the border is just what the wealthiest have carved out for themselves here. Why don't we have adequate social welfare programs and sustainable organizing? Because it is not in their best interest, only ours. You would dedicate your time to that? They're not going to be defending their own people from anything, they'd rather kill you before they let this change.

Another disgusting element to this is the possibility of this implementation as a means of eroding mutual aid networks as the standards of living in Canada deteriorates. Canada has a history of funding more desirable means of resistance and organizing to disarm real challenge to its authority. Tons of stupid settlers could be convinced that some sort of mobilized workforce is a common good and not the restriction of community organizing.

Strange that you arrived at a puritannical explanation where our problems are a result of the moral impurity of individuals and not systemic failure. But sure, you don't harbour conservative values.

Go to Conservative MPP's homes.

This honestly reads like AI it so dependably hits neoliberal talking points.

Why is it incredible? The only time liberals invests in public works is when they are forced to. That's how this system works and the current conditions are extremely favourable to further neoliberalisation of public funds. Canadians are white supremacist settlers in a particularly energetic nationalist moment. It is not hard to sell privileged people on the idea that Canada is threatened by the empire it is a part of and, because they are neglected a understanding of that system, many do believe that military expansion is how that happens.

This is not why the "far right" have experienced successful platforming in North America, it's because their rhetoric is already consistent with the interests of capital. While there are certainly poor fascists, most white people in this country are not so dependent on social welfare programs that erosion of those services fundamentally alters their politics. They already subscribe to those values, and perceived threats do not magnify them, they focus them. It is easy to tell middle-class white suburbanites that jobs and housing are bad because there are too many brown people because they already hated having brown people here and they correctly identify that they are privileged enough to weather whatever consequences may come from that.

Months old now, but yeah, Canada's investment into "AI sovereignty" is to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars into a closely US-aligned company founded by a bunch of UoT jagoffs. If you read through their partnerships with Canada and the UK, it is filled with vague buzzphrases about improving national services and "sovereignty." Apparently , this could mean anything between writing emails for govt employees -- which means they're even less accountable for what they say and do -- or straight up making decisions for our public works. When was the last time you saw the federal government invest that much money into its services? Strange that they should make an investment like this alongside a massive expansion of military spending.

https://cohere.com/blog/canada-uk-government-partnerships

https://cohere.com/blog/secure-ai-in-government-use-cases?ref=cohere-ai.ghost.io

https://www.businessinsider.com/oracle-chooses-cohere-ai-startup-best-alternative-openai-2023-6

https://www.npr.org/2023/09/12/1198885516/these-tech-giants-are-at-the-white-house-today-to-talk-about-the-risks-of-ai

https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/news/2025/03/government-of-canada-finalizes-investment-to-support-canadian-born-ai-leader-cohere.html

Okay, that's fine you've been in "debates" in internet forums, I'm actually an academic who writes about cultural and social norms, and knowledge production professionally.

I'm not going to engage with anything here because its obvious you aren't a serious person but very much want to be recognised as one without the work. Nothing here is honest and you've chosen to argue that I'm just stupid; both good signs that you are very dedicated to your anti-intellectualism.

This has not been a "debate," this was me explaining a useful skill to you. Some honest advice: stop feeling satisfied with yourself just because you feel smart on the internet. You're an adult and nobody is going to force you to grow into something better.

I'm going you ask you how you would explain fermionic condensates to a child who does not even know what the states of matter are let alone subatomic particles and quantum states; what quantum means even. (Do you know what it is?) I think it's obvious to all of us why we simplify things for them even if it's inaccurate for professionals.

Also, you entirely ignored any reality around the preservation of natural knowledge through these cultural practices, which I mentioned to encourage you to also consider how wildly racist this stance is. Countless cultures accurately record their histories and knowledge through practices that dont necessarily conform to the Euro-settler-colonial imagination of knowledge or evidence.

Education systems in liberal states don't prime children to subscribe to distortions because they simplify things, they do that through obscuring the skills to develop that knowledge and through the systemic enforcement of industrious teaching pedagogies that objectifies the students as labour. Yes, that fails to educate students adequately to grow into intellectual adults, but that isn't the purpose of those systems. To conflate necessary elements of growth and education with politically motivated education systems is once again ironically anti-intellectual.

Most of your comment is obviously unreasonable, and I think it's safe to give you the grace to assume that you understand this as well. No, women who get into a witch phase aren't guaranteed to be anti-intellectual or believe in magic as they get older and there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that it does besides your vibes. I called you a doomer because this is a doomer narrative where alternative ways of knowing are not only discarded, but actively constructed as pathological. I've used "ironically" more in these few comments than I have anywhere else in the past year; but this way of thinking is ironically superstitious.

Yup, you failed the charisma check. So desperate.