[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Reasonable advice, but I'd note that I pay for premium and patreon specifically because I can only afford patreon for a few creators. I'd rather pay everyone I watch. While YouTube isn't perfect, I like the service enough that I don't mind paying for it.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

It would make a difference to the people living there who are too poor to leave.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 135 points 1 month ago

A few folks have mentioned that these charts

  1. conflate liberal/conservative with the dominant left/right parties in these nations
  2. does not include people who do not identify with one of those dominant parties
  3. have some somewhat unreliable stats magic behind them

A lot of young men in the US are reporting themselves as "not a Democrat or Republican", and that's causing a lot of this proportional shift. I would bet that characterizes a lot of folks on this site who are not conservative.

https://www.vox.com/politics/2024/3/13/24098780/politics-gender-divide-generation-z-youth-men-women

https://www.allendowney.com/blog/2024/01/28/is-the-ideology-gap-growing/

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 87 points 2 months ago

While I endorse the change, I believe it's being made to avoid arbitration being weaponized by class action plaintiffs, which can be more costly than a class action lawsuit

Eg: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/mass-arbitration-aaa-looks-to-reign-in-4534306/#:~:text=In%20one%20example%2C%20Uber%20was,at%20the%20outset%20of%20cases.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The federal government tracks all student loans, they know very explicitly how many people qualify.

If you're making income based payments, and you have low income, the debt grows over time because the payments aren't even enough to cover interest on the debt.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

2.5 million people qualified for this plan, one of 5 that were put in place.

The plan was largely targeting dropouts, because they tend to be most trapped by loans. They don't get any income benefit from a college degree, and tend to have lower paying jobs. If you're doing income based repayment at minimum wage, it's possible for your loan principle to grow continuously.

I'm not saying it's perfect, but it definitely would have helped people.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Not to mention that women are consistently sexually harassed in games, and leaving the mic off allows them to remain gender ambiguous

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Great to see Greenwald continuing to platform grifters that spread disinformation.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 238 points 8 months ago

Because there's another mass shooting every couple days. It's hard to care about why one dude did something crazy 7 years ago while bullets are still flying. People are much more focused on trying to stop the next one.

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

This appears to be satire

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've noticed some cool original contributions in, for example

https://lemmy.world/c/3dprinting https://lemmy.world/c/ergomechkeyboards https://lemmy.world/c/digitalart https://lemmy.world/c/homeimprovement

There are also lots of active spaces on mastodon. I also have some hope that as the fediverse grows, it will bring over some more niche creative communities from twitter, reddit, etc.

58

I'm engaging with dozens of servers and hundreds of creators on lemmy, and I'd like to give back to more of them. I built a tool a few years ago called subless(subless.com) which aimed to do something similar for the non-federated internet, and I'd like to make something for the Fediverse too.

Do you think donations should be distributed like content?

I threw together a survey that would really help me understand how y'all are thinking about donations. I'd really appreciate it if anyone could fill it out.

Thanks!

[-] puntyyoke@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

There are some good answers here, but I would also note that because the legal system is adversarial, continued investment can go a long way towards a desired outcome. If you can afford a parade of experts, huge amounts of gathered evidence, and contingency plans researched and prepared by dozens of lawyers and paralegals, you'll do better in court.

It's an arms race, so the "best" lawyers have spent the most on arms. That also means that even the worst lawyers have to invest a lot to keep up.

4
submitted 1 year ago by puntyyoke@lemmy.world to c/music@beehaw.org
view more: next ›

puntyyoke

joined 1 year ago