Great TIL, I hate it.

Excellent how the page alludes to other horrible things to imagine, like "don't pour hot oil into your ear", and "don't pour it in if there's a hole in your eardrum"

My general opinion for libraries is that it's fair to stop supporting Python versions as soon as they're EOL. It's unfair to ask maintaners to have to juggle supporting 6 or more Python versions at once, mostly for the benefit of a few companies who haven't updated yet.

I think it's also fair here, you'll still be able to use older versions, you just won't get the newest features, which clearly isn't your number 1 priority if you're still using Python 3.7.

What sort of features 🤔

Of the 1,723 adults surveyed across the UK, 73% said technology companies should, by law, have to scan private messaging for child sexual abuse and disrupt it in end-to-end encrypted environments.

Found this interesting. I found the survey results here: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/68pn2b6b57/NSPCC_OnlineSafetyBill_230427_W.pdf

The exact question I believe is being referred to was:

And do you think technology companies should or should not be required by law to use accredited technology to identify child sexual abuse in end-to-end encrypted messaging apps?

This seems like a really bad question, since it implies a coexistence of end to end encryption and big tech companies being able to read people's messages, which doesn't really make sense (or at least requires more clarification on what that would mean). The question as it is is basically "do you think child sexual abuse is bad".

I wish I could have extensions default to off and be able to turn them on selectively on sites. For things like darkreader I don't want to use it 90% of the time so it shouldn't need to have at access to site data.

By the way, I don't like the title of this article, how is it done "remotely", it's just a list in about:config, no? Sounds clickbaity.

Haha, got a "network error" on my first attempt so clicked send again, I guess it did go through the first time after all :D

I'm worried this will make it harder for people to transition to mastodon as it's more of a shock. It would help if someone made a mastodon frontend to mimic twitter (shitty UI, paywalled, occasionally insert low quality AI generated posts, ads, read limits) for a smoother transition /s

Yeah, there currently seem to be a bunch of rough edges with Lemmy. Another is that iirc editing a comment increases the comment count shown on a post.

Nothing that can't be fixed though, and it's encouraging how good Lemmy feels already compared to reddit (for me at least).

(for anyone wondering, a monad is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors)

Ah, that's too boring. I have a range of responses to pick from to keep things interesting:

• LGTM
• Nice
• Looks good
• Thanks
• Looks great
• :thumbsup:
• Looks good to me
• :shipit:

For me, no text means "I haven't really reviewed this properly so don't want to write anything that could be used against me if (when?) this breaks something in prod"

Agreed, and the questions I have that MDN doesn't answer would probably be ones even less likely for the AI explain to get right.

To be fair, it's no worse than articles some people write on those nonsense websites.