I literally watched a guy die on the shroomery's IRC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Brandon_Vedas
And as was the style at the time, we figured he was fucking with us or assed out, and went on with our day.
I literally watched a guy die on the shroomery's IRC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Brandon_Vedas
And as was the style at the time, we figured he was fucking with us or assed out, and went on with our day.
Well, my original question stands. Is it really a better business decision to choose not to sell at all vs raising prices.
I run a US business where the cost of materials has always been volatile and the cost of the end product follows that. 40% swings aren't uncommon and just get passed onto the end user; my profit stays relatively the same. So I can't fathom just locking the doors when things get expensive (and people are still willing to pay it).
I could understand it if they were doing it as some form of protest, but then it doesn't make sense to only stop selling the low priced options. That's just hurting the people furthest removed from what you are protesting.
I've heard some smart people say her husband might be Don jr's daddy.