I also think that the Israeli attacks are related to Iran's nuclear program but I don't think they are related to this alleged leak. Here is a 25 min long al jazeera podcast for more on this:
Thank you for your input. Even tho I find this to be totally faisable, from what the cradle article provides, I cannot verify much:
- fars looks like it's an Iranian outlet I personnaly don't know if I can trust or not, regardless of mbfc
- the informed sources are not named
- I didn't manage to find the documents mentionned*
Apart from that at some point it mentions that Grossi said in Times of Israel that “We have seen some reports in the press. We haven’t had any official communication about this.”, but it is about Iran stealing Israeli documents.
Anyways, if you or anyone has more on this, please share.
Edit: *I mean deducted, or something
For easy access, here is the text: The Black Flag Catalyst Revolt Guide
Edit: As mentionned in this video, there can be many local variations. Still, imo this guide has valuable inputs.
I'm a bit confused because the title claims that windfarms are habitats, and in the article itself it says:
“We’re trying to understand whether these animals are actually using the wind farms as habitat, or whether they’re being displaced by them,” says Annemiek Hermans, PhD candidate at Wageningen University & Research.
11
Island Solutions: Three Philippine Islands Show What Real Zero Waste Looks Like
(www.pressenza.com)
Here is a very interesting story about baboons in less than 4 minutes.
I have the impression that in order to find a satisfying debunking of the kind, maybe you should look into social darwinism and eugenics. In a way, it's through these pseudoscientific approaches that the stereotypes reguarding colonial hierarchies were established as 'scientific', and created the room for relevant assumptions to take hold of future societies. I say this because I don't believe there is something more to debunk about the 'alpha wolf': it doesn't even apply to wolfs.
Of course, one could look back further for relevant patriachical non-sense.
Anyways, just a few thoughts.
I have noticed that The Conversation has articles that I consider to be great and others that I find to be the opposite. Unfortunately, for me, this one is in the later category.
In this one, mainly they talk about how the technologies will work, about money and the urgency to use this tech. The real urgency is to start phasing out fossil fuel globally. Also, they don't talk about the unintended consequences, the too many known unknowns, and let's keep in mind there are uncountable unknown unknowns in geoengineering.
More info:
The following ideas are not exactly what you ask for, but maybe they are worth considering?
-
I don't know what operating system you use, but for me old computers is how I got into linux. Linux Mint is very easy to install and to use, so it prolongs the life of perfectly good machines that are too old to be updated by proprietary software. Personally, I was doing most updates so that the laptop is as functional as possible for the longest time, and I was always doing the secuity ones. A few years back a friend gave me a 2006 laptop and it worked kind of ok with an old version of mint, it was just very slow. This one was given to another friend who didn't have any.
-
Depending on where you live there could be a makerspace, or a relevant collective that could use them, or parts of them.
-
If they are not working anymore, you can use the parts to do crafts: jewleries, pins, fridge magnets, keychains, light fixture, wall decoration, photo frame, book holder are a few possibilities.
I find the following part to be very illuminating
Yet a million tonnes – or even the full 28 million tonnes that have been purchased to date – is negligible in terms of impact on the climate. At current emissions levels, removing a million tonnes is like undoing 13 minutes out of a full year of emissions,
Not sure what the point is.
It's pretty simple.
It's because Palestine was among former Ottoman territories placed under UK administration by the League of Nations in 1922. All of these territories eventually became fully independent States, except Palestine [source: UN 1917 – 1947: British mandate].
Israel at least has a reason to wage war, even if they've gone wildly overboard.
It is called a Genocide
Also, UN is the one who put Israel where it is.
Yes, and Palestine is recognized as a sovereign state by 147 of the 193 member states of the United Nations, or just over 75% of all UN members. So it makes sense for Palestine to have a full membership.
Coincidentaly, I also posted this article but after reading it a second time, I decided to delete it because I found it was very problematic since it says very contradictory things. If I misunderstood something, please point it out to me.
Examples of contradictions:
Over 99% of the almost 1.89m tCO2e estimated [...] is attributed to Israel’s aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza.
[..] 50% [of CO2e emissions] were generated by the supply and use of weapons, tanks and other ordnance by the Israeli military (IDF), the study found.
- And there is this graph claiming that most emissions by sector come from Gaza aid delivery (trucks).
view more: next ›
The way I see things no nuclear facility should ever be bombed. Never.