supersquirrel

joined 2 years ago
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago

my heart :(

find the places that are full of diversity and life and weave your life into them so that when the forces of extinction come they will face us not them!

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago

yeah it is the door over there everybody keeps pretending doesn't exist but everybody keeps blatantly using???

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yeah, I used to carry around pocket knives when I was a kid as a sort of power trip thing but then I thought about whether it would be worse to win or lose a knife fight and decided if someone did attack me unless I thought my life was truly in danger (or someone else) I would NEVER pull the knife out...

...like seriously, the movies make it seem like it wouldn't be terrifying, awful and traumatizing for anybody involved no matter how it went.....

Don't take my word for it, wear some shitty clothes you use to do chores, get a friend, get two sharpies and have a fake knife fight with the sharpie as the stand in for the knives and then look at all of the sharpie marks over both of you no matter who "won". You will never desire to get in a knife fight ever again after that point.

Yeah nope, a knife is an awful weapon for the wielder, the victim and the observer. Much better to get a leatherman and have a whole set of actually useful tools along with a knife that doesn't scream "IM DANGEROUS" but rather "Im your uncle who loves woodworking's favorite multitool".

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

If you threaten somebody with a lethal weapon in a context where they are defenseless and the surrounding context/society does not place a massive red flag on you for doing so, both the person with the lethal weapon and the society are condemnable.

The point of a weapon is for when you have decided that in order to protect others you must take action, when people use weapons like this to threaten it is an admission that they should not be allowed the responsibility of handling such weapons by the adults around them.

I remember one of the first things I learned about gun safety scared me with a jolt the first time I heard it. It was "don't point a gun at someone you don't intend to kill" .... which I think is wise advice and it enrages me that U.S. media not only is so casual with weaving together guns and hero worship, but that the casualness extends to making casual lethal threats which are one of the scariest things you will ever see because they promise a future you will never want to see if they can continue to thrive out in the open while people ignore them and go about their day.

I didn't understand immediately that part of the wisdom of not pointing a gun at someone you don't intend to kill is that someday (already even?) you will find yourself in a situation where you believe you have decisive power over someone when you are only being lead to believe you do, and in that moment how you choose to use that decisive power, whether you let it reside calmly as an almost trickster spirit or whether you rip it out of the holster and brandish it like a baby having a tamper tantrum (how characters use guns in US media mostly) decides whether the far more powerful observer will intercede and snuff you out because it has seen behind your mask.

Trust isn't a plan, it isn't a geometry or particular formula, it is the spontaneous improbable (yet oh sooooo probable) coordination of elements that saw a new fork in the road and took it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 33 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

Periodic reminder for any children in the room, being jewish and the religion and history of judaism are "one" concept. Israel as a specific country with laws, streets, courts etc.. is a second concept.

Two concepts, not one

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I actually think this would just make her words more powerful tho

Personally, I would smile back to Greta dismantling my ideology, she is smart af : ) and your childish hateful vision of the world is going to topple one day anyhow so why not choose?

This is why life is a verb.

(universal "you" not directing this at anyone in particular)

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 15 hours ago

I voted for Harris because I don't care I just want people to be ok even when they hate me shrugs.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Everybody feels that way at least to a degree when losing, consider that a truly frightening enemy will be patient with you through that process because every moment is a choice.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Now putin will be looking to best that

Why?

All wars require context, and the shift you have seen is Ukraine developed a decisive enough advantage that interests tangential but intersecting to the war in Ukraine realize it.

The decisive advantage is domestic production of self propelled 155mm artillery in Ukraine.

You almost make it sound like putin sacrificed these planes as an olive branch or something.

No, you have this backwards, this is how a more powerful enemy beats you because it allows an opening for the loser to turn to the crowd and make a bunch of noise and get everyone riled up while they know from their strategic military brain that well those bombers were nice launch platforms for loitering with BVR weapons or killing civilians en masse (turns out this is real bad and we shouldn't try to drop as many bombs on people as you can) but they aren't critical elements of a military that if were crippled would make a leader trying to exit a war look weak to rivals.

Anybody in Russia who understands modern warfare will understand that while those bombers were useful and large bomber platforms to launch drones will absolutely be a realm of weapons development, that even in that future war case there are already massive freight airliners being produced all of the world by aircraft companies that will work pretty much as good. This isn't the same thing as knocking out SUPER critical military infrastructure that places a losing enemy leader in a position where they might act existentially vs. keep seeing the tactical benefit of delaying and retreating instead of going on the offensive.

This is basic Klingon anti-war philosophy/theory, you gotta educate yourself on this stuff.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 15 hours ago

Speak softly and carry a big helicopter

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

ha, James, that is my heart not some space rock you fool!

79
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

 

I play this game on my steam deck/pc, but I have played with xbox players quite a bit in the cross platform multiplayer. I would imagine this would be a great multiplayer vehicle big map shooter to play with friends or by yourself against bots with a PS4 too since Easy Red 2 has very reasonable graphics requirements.

There is more than meets the eye to this game, one thing that I particularly love is that you can easily give simple commands to ai squads, so you can drive a halftrack up to a capture point and give them the order to dismount and attack the objective after you have driven next to a wall for some cover. Nothing complicated, but it is quick, direct and effective!

 

Easy Red 2 is already released for Xbox too! It plays wonderfully on steam deck as well! (use gyro aim!), flying the fighter bomber planes is a blast with the steam deck controls! (or a gamepad).

Shanghai - Nanking Campaign trailer

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8VjKBlBBvKI

I know I am sharing a post for dlc for a game... and I also know I recommend Easy Red 2 a lot but it is because the game deserves so much more attention.

Let me try to convince you:

  1. The base game is cheap, under $10 for a multiplayer battlefield-like game with no bullshit microtransactions, no liveservice nonsense, no required account creation and login and necessary anti-cheat creepy access to your computer... it is just a game you buy for ~$9 and play either online or offline.

  2. The gunplay is good, like.. maybe not the best game ever but it is satisfying, guns feel realistic, machine guns behave like big bulky machine guns, this is a fun fps just on the merits of its core fps mechanics.

  3. This game has big maps with TONS of different historically accurate!!!! vehicles. Tanks, half tracks, trucks, jeeps, tanks with rocket artillery strapped to the top, oddball tanks that went obsolete quickly into the war.... the list goes on.

  4. The AI gunners are good enough (not amazing by any means) that if you just want to chill and drive a tank around and let your crew blast away infantry/bots you can. Or you can take control of the driving and firing and handle everything yourself.

  5. Want to botbash ravenfield style? You can. You can do it with friends in a private multiplayer game or in a multiplayer game, pvp or pve.

  6. The game runs well on potatoes, I have zero issues running Easy Red 2 on my steam deck, which also means relatively good battery life!

  7. There is quite a bit of DLC, but it is interesting DLC that attempts to explore the full historical span of WW2 battles rather than just hyperfocus on the pop culture touchstones that usually get retold in movies and games. This is fun both from just the plain variety to scenarios, landscapes, equipment and vehicles that the DLC offers, but also from a WW2 history nerd who doesn't just want to see another D-Day level it is much more interesting.

https://easyred2.com/

https://www.corvostudio.it/

 

It seems like this isn't an easy problem to solve without lots of money to pay for hosting.. but I had the thought recently, what if a video heavy fediverse platform was designed from the ground up with the intention that people were going to remix video content and that those remixes/tweaks could be saved and transferred across the network as modifications of a pre-existing large video file instead of needing to copy the entire video file onto to some valuable and scarce storage again just to slightllllyyy tweak it?

For some content you might not even need to create a new copy of the video file at all, not even a clip, the "new video" could just be specific instructions for how to playback portions of the original video file with certain additions/tweaks.

I know this is abstract, but I think there might be something to treating the way certain videos and concepts become "meme-ified" as a logical and natural way to structure intelligent minimization of unnecessary data use. A "montage" from a livestream or long video could just be a series of playback instructions for a pre-existing video file or video files with some tweaks and additions like text overlays or different audio.

It would have lots of practical benefits too, say a professor uploaded a video and needed to make a correction to a small part of the video where she stated something incorrect in her lecture. If the edit to the video involved her creating a "new video" that just had instructions to this hypothetical video player to play the original lecture video and then insert a brief new video segment with the correction (or just several frames of a textbox with the correction), or to just simply cut that section of the video from the playback with a simple fade... might that be a much quicker process than creating an entire new video file and re-uploading it and better than just settling for a comment in the video overlay/in the video description?

shrugs I know it is just a vague idea but has anybody tried something like this? (in practice maybe it would look something like a really simple video editor built into a youtube-like interface?).

A very simple example of this for picture memes would be a meme creation and sharing fediverse software where each meme format was only ever represented by one picture on the server, and every meme created of that type was just vector graphics style instructions for how to overlay text on that image. You could store a massssive amount of memes with a tiny tiny tiny amount of storage space right?

 

Throw this python plugin into your GIMP 3.0.0 installation's plugin folder (if you already have gimp installed, uninstall it and make a fresh install, at least that is my advice).

When you open GIMP under "File" is the "Batch Convert" option, which brings up a really nice GUI for doing conversion of image files, but also basic edits.

I know there are command line utilities for this kind of thing, I know there are paid commercial programs that do this kind of thing.. but having an open source optional-GUI utility that does this that also happens to be attached to an extremely mature and fully featured open source image editor is pretty awesome.

https://kamilburda.github.io/batcher/

https://www.gimp.org/

 

as a USian lemme say, hell yes

view more: next ›