[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

fish. I think it has most things i want out of the box, so it should be simpler and snappier than my zsh setup. it's just that zsh hasnt bothered me enough to try it yet.

also nushell, im interested in the idea of manipulating structured data instead of unstructured text

64
[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 weeks ago

And make sure the time is synced to the cloud so they need internet connection, and so the player can't be sneaky and reload the game to reset the timer if they pressed x too many times

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 weeks ago

This reminds me of my ex gf 😅 not only does she enjoy "kid" shows and movies, but HER NAME IS ANDY TOO. That image would definitely dealt some damage. For us though we broke off on good terms. Right person, wrong time, wrong place :(

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

I think I agree on the cooldowns. Often times I wanted to step away and let the pixels accumulate, but it's hard to resist when you realize you'd be missing out on double or triple the amount of pixels you could be placing. If the goal was to reward the player for actively placing pixels, all I can say is it didn't feel very rewarding.

I kinda disagree about the integer scaling. 1x to 2x zoom is a very big shift without any in-between. It would also feel strange on pinch-to-zoom on mobile without in-between. I think instead it could snap to an integer scaling, or have a zoom slider that works to integer scaling. Overall though I agree, having a way to snap into integer scaling makes the pixel art look better

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 month ago

On mobile I kept opening the whois pixel by accident when dragging. I often tap and hold to initiate a drag because I'm still looking at the art, but when i drag away and let go, it opens the whois thing. I think if you drag a certain screen-space distance away it should cancel the whois pixel lookup.

The heatmap I found too hard to tell where recent pixels were placed. I think at 100% opacity the "cold" pixels should be dark blue instead of their actual color.

A couple times I placed a dot, realized I actually didn't want it there and ran out of time to undo, which felt bad having to wait 30s. I wish it was a bit longer.

When you try to place a pixel a few milliseconds too early I feel like it should queue it and wait the few milliseconds for you.

I'm not super sure on the canvas having transparency. Most people treated the canvas as white, not transparent. If you wanted a white-on-white drawing, people will just make an outline.

Maybe a concept worth testing: if you place a pixel next to your own pixels, you get a (slightly) reduced cooldown, that way you get an extra boost when completing your art. (At the same time, I think there is beauty in the canvas being as simple as possible:)

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If they aren't equal, there should be a number in between that separates them. Between 0.1 and 0.2 i can come up with 0.15. Between 0.1 and 0.15 is 0.125. You can keep going, but if the numbers are equal, there is nothing in between. There's no gap between 0.1 and 0.1, so they are equal.

What number comes between 0.999... and 1?

(I used to think it was imprecise representations too, but this is how it made sense to me :)

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 1 month ago

Imagine they have an internal tool to check if the hash exists in their database, something like

"SELECT user FROM downloads WHERE hash = '" + hash + "';"

You set the pdf hash to be 1'; DROP TABLE books;-- they scan it, and it effectively deletes their entire business lmfaoo.

Another idea might be to duplicate the PDF many times and insert bogus metadata for each. Then submit requests saying that you found an illegal distribution of the PDF. If their process isn't automated it would waste a lot of time on their part to find the culprit Lol

I think it's more interesting to think of how to weaponize their own hash rather than deleting it

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

I was thinking that the user intentionally chose their distro, because of the Ubuntu character.

Cool, more free stuff

Arch, you want more free stuff faster

Not again!

Debian, you want to set and forget, so any updates that do come up are still a nuisance

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
o Windows 10
|
o Linux Mint
|
|\__
|   \
|    o Manjaro KDE
|    |
o Fedora KDE
|    |\__
|    |   \
x    |    o Windows 11
     |    o Windows 11 + Arch Linux
     |    |
     o Arch Linux
     |    |
     |    |
     |    o Windows 11 + Debian KDE
     |    |

hopefully it renders well on your client :D

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 months ago

My first impression is that it feels fake because of:

when kids our on him

our -> are

Come try are boy

are -> our

Maybe it depends on accent but "are" and "our" are homophones in my accent and if you spelled by sound you'd likely spell "our" as "are" ..i cant help but feel like it's intentionally increasing the mistake counter :(

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

I've had this type of itch to keyboardize my workflow more. I learned about colemak keyboard mods, and started following the rabbit hole haha. Did you design your keyboard pcb too? or just wrote custom firmware?

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 months ago

XWayland normally runs x11 apps seamlessly (more or less) in Wayland

XWayland rootful spawns a window which is like a virtual monitor running a full x11 session inside it. You spawn apps inside of the window using the DISPLAY variable

view more: next ›

tuna

joined 3 months ago