the first one was confident. But wrong. The second one could be just as confident and just as wrong.
vrighter
joined 2 years ago
what makes the checker models any more accurate?
i know you meant live metal. But I love the concept of love metal. There's a spark between us
raytracing still needs to do subsurface scattering. It can actually do it for real though. It also "wastes" a lot of bounces, so is usually approximated anyway
the word insisting shows your arrogance. Insisting on something implies one has a choice. Those who are sticking with X11 are doing so because wayland just does not do what they need.
when I need to type a dangerous command, i prepend it with #, so it's just a comment.
Only when I'm really sure do i go back to the start of the line and remove the #
you made me snort coffee out of my nose. I hoepe you're proud of yourself
1.19 MHz, 1/8 kB RAM
so no transposition tables, no endgame databases, nothing that requires pretty much any memory.
for some reason it reminds me of a quote from friends: "voice recognition is gonna be pretty much standard on any computer you buy. So you can be like 'wash my car', 'clean my room'. You know it's not gonna be able to do any of those things, but it'll understand what you're saying"
it's pretty hard to implement two variations of a brute force search.
how does that stop the checker model from "hallucinating" a "yep, this is fine" when it should have said "nah, this is wrong"