1005
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How can it even be possible to vote illegally once let alone so many times. Id be whinning about it too!

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Maybe because asking for identification is communism?

(I don't know how voting works over there, just guessing)

[-] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago

This wasn’t a case that ID would fix. He registered illegally and voted under his own name. It wasn’t caught because government information is not shared very well between agencies in the US. Rather than the election officials actually checking, he had to sign a sworn declaration that he was legally allowed to vote as part of his registration, and lying in that sworn declaration is one of the things he was also charged with in this case.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"It's not a case that ID would fix because the whole system is so broken that it doesn't make any difference"

That's what I read.

I'm glad that you can focus on such small issues. Other countries have functioning voting systems.

[-] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

You seem to be under a misconception that explaining what happened is condoning something. Your snarkasm would be better directed elsewhere.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I would maybe argue with you if I had the faintest idea of what you were going on about.

[-] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

That’s pretty much exactly how I feel. You said you didn’t understand something, so I went and looked it up and explained what I found. Then you started coming at me as if I were defending the guy. I’m not here for that knee jerk reaction. I swear, idk why I even talk to humans anymore.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Letting criminals swear that they are not going to do something illegal sounds like an extremely naive approach to this problem

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

The sworn statement is there so that when they get caught it is very easy to prosecute them as you can show they put their signature to a false statement.

Their credibility is destroyed.

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
1005 points (99.2% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4999 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS