1263
That'll teach ya (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Few people are required reporters and those will be medical workers, public school employees, and people who work for universities for the most part. Calling 911 will get your friend shot by the police in the worst case, and traumatized and in debt in the best case.

Few people are required reporters

So what do you do if a casual acquaintance tells you they're intending harm to themselves or others ?

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Whatever I feel like. If I care for someone you better believe I won’t call authorities and make their life worse while destroying our relationship.

Kinda sounds like you don't have an answer.

Sure, if your bestie is having a tough time then of course you'll talk to them and do whatever it takes not to call EMS.

If it's a "casual acquaintance" as I said your options kinda diminish.

I called EMS for my neighbor once. A few days later his mother came to thank me profusely.

I'm not in the US though so things work a bit differently here.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

They are still traumatically carting people away, depriving them of liberty, and not really helping.

Obviously the "not really helping" is the critical part of that statement.

In many cases they help a great deal.

"Depriving people of liberty" is also an appeal to emotion. While that does happen briefly in some cases, it's not really the norm. I'm sure you'll find that any one in healthcare is only going to do that if the patient is at risk of harming themselves or others. The alternative is allowing people the liberty to harm themselves or others.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

And I take the stance that people have a right to self harm or self end.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 5 months ago

Sure ok. That's a cool edgy take, but you have to acknowledge that view will never be widely held.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

There’s nothing edgy. If someone is suffering enough to want to leave then it’s cruel to force them to stay.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 5 months ago

Only if that suffering is untreatable.

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I get your point but let's not pretend that the world is in a good state and that healthcare can fix all mental or physical issues. Often if you have gotten to the point of suicide it's because you're not treatable or because of external factors like extreme poverty.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm sorry, but this seems divorced from reality and resonates in precisely the same way that "pro lifers" resonate when they make a claim that adoption is the answer to abortion. Well, ok, show me where there are lines of people waiting to adopt. Likewise, show me where the infrastructure is to heal all these people.

It's "divorced from reality" to suggest we should intervene when someone wants to commit suicide?

I don't know what to say to you mate. Good day.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It is. People who want help will seek it. Otherwise leave them alone.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
1263 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5198 readers
3347 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS