258
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Whether you're really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 69 points 7 months ago

IPv6

I mean, why the hell is IPv4 still a thing??

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago
[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago

Because SecOps still thinks NAT is security, and NetOps is decidedly against carrying around that stupid tradition.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

You can even Nat still if you want too lol

That said have you looked at securing ipv6 networks?It can be a lot of new paridgms that need to be secured.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

bruh you could just use dyndns on ipv6 and call it a day, even more secure than ipv4 with NAT. lmao.

[-] kawa@reddeet.com 2 points 7 months ago

Try to remember a handful of them

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

In the world of computers, why would remembering numbers be the stop for new technologies?

Do you remember anyone's public key? Certificate?

I don't even remember domain (most) names, just Google them or save them as bookmarks or something.

The reason IPv4 still exists is because ISPs benefit from its scarcity. Big ISPs already paid a lot of money to own IPv4 addresses, if they switched to IPv6 that investnywould be worthless.

Try selling static IPv6 addresses as they do now with IPv4. People would laugh at them and just get a free IPv6 address from an ISP that wants to get new users and doesn't charge for it.

The longer ISPs delay the adoption of IPv6, the longer they can milk IPv4 scarcity.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

I don't even remember my old ICQ UIN. People usually do that.

So yes, bring in IPv6.

[-] mukt@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Which ISPs offer IPv6 for free?
Asking for a friend.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

IPv6 addresses are practically endless, therefore their value is practically 0. ISPs justify charging extra for static IPv4 because IPv4 addresses do have a value.

If ISPs charge for static IPv6, then one of them could just give that service for free (while keeping the rest of the prices the same as their competitors). That would get them more customers while costing them nothing.

EDIT: I can't give you an example of an ISP that offers free static IPv6 because there are no ISPs in my country that offer IPv6.

[-] droans@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Should be every single one that supports IPv6.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

For that matter, you should be getting an entire /60 at a minimum. Probably more like /56.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

damn if only we had a service that like, obfuscated and abstracted these hard to remember IPs that aren't very user friendly, and turned them into something more usable. That would be cool i think. Someone should make that.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Some kind of name system surely.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

perhaps one that were to operate on like, a domain level, maybe.

gah, i'm just not too sure there's a good term for this though.

[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Shortening rules actually make IPv6 addresses easier to remember than IPv4. Just don't use auto configuration.

[-] foobaz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

That's just one loopback address.

I could list 2^24 IPv4 loopback addresses.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
258 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

48375 readers
2080 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS