1004
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MdRuckus@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teft@sh.itjust.works 176 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. Texas
  2. Oklahoma
  3. Louisiana
  4. (tie) South Carolina
  5. (tie) Alabama
  6. Missouri
  7. Indiana
  8. Tennessee
  9. Arkansas
  10. Florida
[-] Ohthereyouare@lemm.ee 94 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I personally agree with this list. But, we have to be pragmatic here. This is what CNBC says they did:

"The study measures quality of life issues including crime, health care, childcare and health care, as well as inclusive policies on discrimination and reproductive rights."

See, the last two skew this study. People in these shit hole states (not all, but at least enough of the voting public) don't want inclusive policies or reproductive rights. So, to them, this metric is backwards. They would argue that living in California or New York was way more terrible because of the brown people and gays.

This isn't exactly a scientific study. It's taking objective data to reach a subjective conclusion. Neat headline though.

Edit: many if them are arguing exactly that in this thread. With a nice dose of racism and misogyny thrown in. Nice. I love when shit comes full circle.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I mean… if you want to move to one of these states as potentially any type of person (ie. perhaps not white and straight) then the inclusive policies are not an optional feature. If you’re a woman, having the government meddle in your health decisions can actually be life threatening.

For white, straight folks, and especially males, it’s easy to think these other two factors just subjectively improve life, but that’s because they already have a baseline level of respect and power in society.

Based on your take, I’d guess you’re straight, white and male.

[-] OwenEverbinde@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago

Granted, I'm also straight, white, and male... But there are a hell of a lot of women who support abortion bans AND adore Mr "Grab 'em by the Pussy!"

I know one who doesn't believe God would allow a dangerous, nonviable pregnancy to take hold in (or in the case of ectopic pregnancies, outside of) a woman's uterus. She just doesn't believe something as sacred as a uterus can have that kind of flaw built into it.

And even if you could convince her dangerous pregnancies were real, I think @Ohthereyouare@lem.ee was saying that Republican women would not agree that their ability to survive an ectopic pregnancy is good or worth it if it also helps the "sluts" they despise to have more "convenience abortions."

Surviving might seem pretty good to you and I, but that doesn't make that ability objectively desirable to the people voting against their own interests. And they would be offended if their access to healthcare was deemed "better" in a quality-of-life metric than access to a set of theocratic restrictions.

They would tell you, "well I'm happier. Liberals think they can speak for me just because I'm a woman and my opinion doesn't matter! But if they asked me, I'd tell them I would prefer to live in a place where the sanctity of life was valued! They'd have to censor me and edit me out of their videos because I wouldn't support their narrative!"

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I know one who doesn't believe God would allow a dangerous, nonviable pregnancy to take hold in (or in the case of ectopic pregnancies, outside of) a woman's uterus. She just doesn't believe something as sacred as a uterus can have that kind of flaw built into it.

But I guarantee that the second that she (or any other woman with similar views) had a pregnancy that threatened their life, they'd opt for an abortion ASAP. They'll rationalize that their abortion was justified and blessed by God, but all those other abortions are just "liberal sluts who want to kill babies" or something.

[-] ArcticCircleSystem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So what are we supposed to do to get them to stop choosing to be horrible like this? Can't do nothing... ~Cherri

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yup, I am, but if it's fair to say that the positive things about Florida don't count because those positive things exist in other states then it seems to me that it's fair to say that prejudice against minorities should count against those other states too. Florida does not have exclusive rights to mistreatment of minorities. In fact I'm pretty sure that exists in all 50 states.

My only point, was addressing the thought that a poster said he felt sorry for people living in those states (Florida in this case) and all I was saying was it wasn't like we all just get up every morning and fail to function because we are all so overwhelmed by how bad it is where we live. We have running water in Florida.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

Reproductive rights is healthcare.

[-] Ohthereyouare@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. It is. That's sorta the point though. "Worst" is subjective. Personally? I'd never move to one of those 10 places. But, a lot of them think that the lack of reproductive rights is a good thing, not a bad thing.

I don't think that... But, a lot of folks in America do.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Just not a majority anywhere. Minority rule baby!

[-] Ohthereyouare@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Did I mention majorities?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] atempuser23@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think the premise is that the laws on reproductive rights have managed to effect the overall availability of health care. So it's not that the laws are bad, but some of them are written in such a way that it creates problems, or potential problems, for doctors. So Dr's are overall not choosing to get into situations where the law could make them liable and are choosing to set up practice in other locations where the government overreach isn't as bad.

The affirmative discrimination laws are generally hard to write well so they tend to add restrictions to people and businesses that are unintended.

It seems that those discrimination and reproductive rights are no longer 'soft' issues and this poll is acknowledging that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

As someone born in Texas and now resides in Oklahoma I agree with this study.

[-] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

sweats in Georgia

[-] Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

As someone from West Virginia I'm stunned we didn't make the list. McDowell county is hell on earth. The northern part of the state really does hard carry the rest of it.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Economic and health factors in this ranking are severely downplayed in favor of hot social issues.

[-] banned@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

!savedyouaclick@lemmy.nrd.li

[-] Mostly_Harmless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If you want a good chuckle, here are the states that they say have the best economies. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/13/these-10-states-are-running-americas-best-economies-for-residents.html

Included in the top 10 are:

  • Florida
  • Texas
  • Tennessee
  • South Carolina
  • Indiana
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Best economies for CEOs.

[-] BigNote@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

One would only think that's surprising or funny if they assumed that "best economy" and "best states to live in" necessarily have a one to one overlap. While I can see there being some overlap, l think we all know that business-friendly policies that foster economic growth almost always come with a suite of larger demographic costs.

The key is to seek balance between what's good for business and what's good for the public, and in that light it shouldn't really come as a surprise that some of the most business-friendly states are also the worst places to live.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't the inflation rate in Florida the highest in the nation?

[-] Jeff@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Moved from TX to DMV in Feb and it’s night and day here. Love the idea of Texas but the reality didn’t come close.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Jeff@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

DC Maryland Virginia area.

Don’t get me wrong it not a utopia but much better. I miss Bucees and HEB. There’s also just as many bad drivers here, and the speed limits are LOOOOOW. But folks are on the whole nicer (which to me is weird as I heard folks here weren’t as nice as in Texas). And where I used to live 4 hours would get you to Beaumont and here it’ll get you through three states.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I've never even been there. I believe you on the nicer, it's probably genuine and not the superficial "How y'all doing?"

[-] leapingleopard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

what was your experience like?

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
1004 points (93.8% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4403 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS