1058
submitted 3 months ago by EssentialNPC@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Federal Trade Commission narrowly voted Tuesday to ban nearly all noncompetes, employment agreements that typically prevent workers from joining competing businesses or launching ones of their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 86 points 3 months ago

I remember my last job had a Non compete. I was a handy man. Non competes for NBA players and wealthy CEOs, fine. But non compete for just regular people doing regular jobs is crazy. Once I leave my current job, my ex employer should have no say in where I work afterwards.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 32 points 3 months ago

That's just so they can treat you like crap and under pay you, so that you can't just go be a handy many somewhere else. If you lived in California it would have already been unenforceable anyway though.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Why is good for athletes and ceos? And is that the specific line that you would draw? NC seems like it benefits corporations and organizations but almost never individuals. Seems better to eliminate all together to me.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

It's fine for them because they're being paid tens and hundreds of millions. And they can easily reject the contract and not sign. Don't act like a cleaning lady and an NBA player are in the same boat

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

"It's fine for them" isn't a reason to keep something in place. That will just allow it to creep closer and closer to the cleaning lady (I don't think many cleaning ladies are signing non competes though - this is not a representative example). Non competes are typically for higher level talent, the line between it specialist, physicians, minor league athletes and ceos and NBA players starts to blur. There is no good argument to keep these.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Executives make some sense because they made deciding the direction of companies, and can take “unfair advantage”.

Athletes, no. They bring mostly their own talent and effort, and that’s also what they bring to a new team. They are only employable by doing the same thing for someone else, and likely in the same league: literally competing . Non-competes don’t make any more sense for athletes than they do for baristas

[-] OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

And if your employer doesn’t want you working elsewhere, they should put you on garden leave.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Canadian here. I had one for working in a call centre ffs. And afaik we don't have laws against it. :(

[-] nepenthes@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

My understanding is that they aren't enforceable. Also, Ontario has a ban since 2021.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Non competes for NBA players

This sounds so stupid. Big sport is dead. Go play chess.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Huh? What are you even getting offended at? Are you just seeking out things to be mad at?

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Offended? Why? I'm just saying that if this is true, then "big sport" is more broken than I imagined. And that chess is good sport that does not have such bullshit.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
1058 points (99.4% liked)

News

22470 readers
4702 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS