301
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I think there is one concern that cant be argued against: if a genetic basis were found, that opens the way to parents selecting against those genes in their unborn children. Like... imagine parents or the government deciding that theyd very much like to eradicate LGBT people before theyre born and having the capability to make it happen.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Not sure I really want people like that being parents. If you view children as a status symbol and anything your "friends" view as an imperfection is unacceptable to you then what kinda parent are you going to be?

But to be fair my narcissist mother would sometimes not totally suck.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Thing is... they are going to be parents. They just wont be parents to someone that is LGBT. Its eugenics.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I guess it will be a bit annoying that there will be slightly less LGBT people tens of millions of years from now compared to today. I will set an alert if you want.

You are talking about an insanely small effect that requires a precise sequence of events

  1. Company makes a pernatal LGBT test

  2. The product actually works, which holy shit no it won't. It is way more complicated than screening for say Down syndrome.

  3. It is widely accepted as working

  4. The average human on earth makes a few dollars a day and yet they have the money to pay for this and do reproductive counseling and decide to abort on this

  5. Somehow someway all 8 billion people have this removed from them and it is maintained for tens of millions of years to get enough distance between those future humans and us to prevent random mutations from reverting it. Hell chickens are still born with teeth in rare occasions. That is a 80 million year reversion.

So yeah not worried. If you need something to worry about you can read up on climate change.

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

There will be exactly the same amount of queer people. They just will have been subjected to even more gatekeeping and conversion therapy because it was believed that by genetically altering them they would not be queer. Which isn't true, being queer is not a product of genetics.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Citation needed that people are going to "genetic altering" whatever that is supposed to mean.

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Aborting babies that have the gene? Or otherwise altering the genetics of embryos prior to development? You can use inference you know.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
301 points (98.1% liked)

News

21850 readers
4883 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS