124
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So Meta, Twitter, Snapchat and all the others who've redefined what data collection looks like and keep folks self centered is fine? The only reason the US is throwing this fit is because they can't access the collected data like they can with US based data brokers, I mean social media. The key aspect of this ban revolves around freedom of speach more than anything else.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Of course but still TikTok is not a good thing imo

[-] Ciel@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 months ago

I agree, but this is a little off topic imo

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 months ago

Can't agree tbh

[-] charonn0@startrek.website -5 points 6 months ago

No, of course it's not fine.

But if it's not fine for domestic social media apps to do it, then it's even worse for a foreign adversary to do it. Right?

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

It is the same worse. Billionaires do not have an allegiance to the well-being of any nation's citizens. What is a foreign state going to brainwash us with that could possibly be worse than the existing gamer-to-far-right-radical pipeline?

[-] charonn0@startrek.website -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They could use their advertising platform to manipulate US public opinion and elections. And, again, this isn't to say it's fine for domestic companies to do this. But that's no argument against this law. In fact, I daresay the "gamer-to-far-right-radical pipeline" you identify is an example of this.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

I don't think I would argue against this law, IDK. It's just a slap in the face to see they recognize how dangerous the thing is.

We always knew they would do nothing to legislate misinformation, bigotry, and electioneering on the US-based platforms. But now we know for a fact that they understand these platforms are weaponized against the public.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

Far, far worse for your own country to have that data. If you live in the US for example, facebook can and does forward your messages about getting an abortion to law enforcement if you live in one of the no-abortion states. That mother and daughter both have charges now.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
124 points (94.3% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
512 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS