221
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hark@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago

Supporting genocide or not supporting genocide. Gee, what a tough choice.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 24 points 7 months ago

sigh

Study a little US history and you’ll find we’ve struggled with that question pretty much since the nation’s founding.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's not been much of a struggle. We've almost always been solidly in favor

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 9 points 7 months ago

Before Pearl Harbor, the US was totally fine with what the Nazis were doing in Europe, even going as far as to disparage Jewish people and refuse to allow them to come from Europe to the US for asylum. Seems things never change and our leaders consistently have no problem being on the wrong side of history.

[-] goferking0 5 points 7 months ago

Probably wouldn't have had an issue or done anything in Europe if nazis didn't declare war on us

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

small pox blankets have entered the chat

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

The fact that the US has made bad choices doesn't make not supporting genocide a complex question

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago

It does beg the question, what other pressures is he facing and why would he bow to them?

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

In your words of a tough choice… The moral choice is not tough. The quick “just do it” take is not tough. It’s easy to just throw all in.

The actual steps that must be made at the level of potus are tough even with the will. The time, the complexity, the repercussions, the fallout… the reality that is a little less clear than “all or nothing” is hard. The ship does not turn on a dime.

Not disagreeing with you but just saying it’s not a simple choice, but instead a tough direction in a world where the GOP sees presidential powers only apply to republicans and democrats aren’t even citizens.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

There are many things that can be done, but biden isn't doing any of them. There are also things he could simply not do (e.g. supplying weapons), but he goes out of his way to do them. I'd understand if biden was trying to do the right thing, but he's really not.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

I would argue that they are being done but you’re not seeing the effects quite yet.

I can dig it. While the compromise is unfortunately still ongoing, it’s important to not get caught up in compromise

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You can argue it but you would be dead fucking wrong.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Until we know those details, your just projecting cope.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Recognizing the speed of reality isn’t projecting anything and learn to spell.

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

How hard is to just not sign a piece of paper that gives tens of billions to Israel? Seems pretty easy to me.

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
221 points (89.3% liked)

News

23659 readers
3538 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS