88
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago

The recent war in Ukraine made me a lot more cautious of nuclear because if there's a belligerent who's willing to cross the Rubicon by bombing nuclear plants (ie the US), then all the statistics about nuclear plants being safe goes out the window. There's also speculation that if Israel nukes Tehran, Iran will launch hypersonic cruise missiles targeting Israeli nuclear plants and Chernobyl Israel since their main nuclear plant is located at the very center of Israel on top of other nuclear plants that are located close to urban centers.

Of course, it's not like bombing coal plants will have zero environmental impact and I would imagine blowing up dams will overall do far more environmental damage and kill far more people.

The relevant questions are:

  1. What are the environmental impacts and human costs of a nuclear plant being bombed and destroyed by a belligerent military?

  2. What safeguards can be placed to thwart or mitigate military attacks targeting nuclear plants?

[-] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago

if i didn't want iran to bomb my nuclear power plants i would simply not bait them into conflict when committing genocide

Death to America

[-] memory_adept@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago

iran is not going to blow up your power plant. nuclear plant in ukraine wasn't destroyed in recent fighting either. the hypersonic missiles were just regular ballistic missiles that reach hypersonic velocities at the end of their flight path, not state-of-the-art. it's not speculation iran can absolutely sustain a blackout of israel

[-] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Taking a look at Chernobyl today, the environmental impacts of a melted down or destroyed nuclear reactor are way less destructive (maybe not destructive at all, except to human life within close proximity of the reactor) than the costs of avoiding nuclear in fear of these hypothetical possibilities

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15830 readers
526 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS