303
Top 200 Defederated instances from the Fediverse (May 2024)
(links.hackliberty.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
303 points (95.8% liked)
Fediverse
28736 readers
135 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Good that threads.net is in top 50 but I would've liked to see it higher. Right now it is at 39th place.
Edit: Also what is the source for the picture?
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
https://fed.dembased.xyz/scoreboard?blocked=200
Thank you.
For me a lot of the interesting part isn't which instances are being defederated, but why. Giving a quick glance, most defed reasons seem to be fairly sensible, with only a few being assumptive or outright idiotic (like blanket top domain defederation).
I like that clicking on the instance shows the reason given (if any) for each defederation.
My favorite:
Thx.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
What's up with the downvotes?
It's so weird.
Due to the fact that Facebook has chosen to involve software that will allow the theft of my personal information, I do declare the following: on this day, 30th November 2014, in response to the new Facebook guidelines and under articles L.111, 112 and 113 of the code of intellectual property, I declare that my rights are attached to all my personal data, drawings, paintings, photos, texts etc... published on my profile since the day I opened my account. For commercial use of the foregoing my written consent is required at all times. Those reading this text can copy it and paste it on their Facebook wall. This will allow them to place themselves under the protection of copyright. By this release, I tell Facebook that it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, broadcast, or to take any other action against me on the basis of this profile and/or its contents. The actions mentioned above apply equally to employees, students, agents and/or other staff under the direction of Facebook. The contents of my profile include private information. The violation of my privacy is punished by the law (UCC 1 1-308 - 308 1 -103 and the Rome Statute). Facebook is now an open capital entity. All members are invited to post a notice of this kind, or if you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you have not published this statement at least once, you will tacitly allow the use of elements such as your photos as well as the information contained in your profile update. Do not share. Just copy on paste on your wall.
Lmao it was funny seeing that making the rounds
Goofy ah copypasta. Copyright applies automatically, you don't need to publish a statement proclaiming it. Facebook is already forbidden from using your work commercially without your consent. They'll do it anyway though because Zuck knows he can get away with it
You missed the point. The commenter is explaining why the parent commenter was heavily downvoted (hint: they're doing something similar.)
Cringe.
You're missing the commenter's observation through that facebook joke.
People who downvote you don't get it. That was funny!
The anti-commercial useless link.
A bit of an overreaction though?
AI simps. There's more and more of them on the fediverse, for some reason. They're getting a bit less active on Mastodon, as Elongated Muskrat is also being an AI fan.
I think AI is annoying AF and Elon Musk can fuck right off.
But this "license disclaimer" has the energy of mom posting one of these "I herby forbid facebook to use my images and personal data" disclaimer to their facebook profile.
And adding this idocy to literally every lemmy comment just makes you look like a right twat.
I don't think the license will do anything legally, but I hope the inclusion of the license poisons some data for LLM training. Unfortunately, it is all really uniform across all the people doing it and all their comments, so it will be easy to strip out.
It's like not throwing garbage on the streets in a polluted city. Doesn't really change the big picture, but if everybody did it it would make a difference.
See: users avoiding their content getting shadow banned using alternate spellings like s3x.
Any individual action can be combatted easily. A million different signatures and headers is a whole different .
Mind you, LLM training data is polluted with anything and everything, including other languages. Recently, the best performance has been reached using higher quality data.
Well, it does render the comment useless in terms of training an LLM..
No clue.
My theories:
Because that's literally all the information my comment gives.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
My theory -
Your comments clutter up threads with the stupid links posted every single comment at the bottom.
If everyone did this, comment threads would be unreadable.
Get rid of them.
The copyleft license link does nothing to prevent what you're trying to prevent.
It's the silly license thing
Higher than the blatant pedo instances? Those are too far down on the list, tbh.