Nuclear power explained in 12 numbers to help you understand how it fits Australia’s energy needs (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 4 months ago by MHLoppy@fedia.io to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As the shift away from fossil fuels gathers pace, the Coalition has turned to an emissions-free technology with a long and contentious history — nuclear fission. These are the numbers you should keep in mind when thinking about its place in Australia’s energy transition.

I encourage you to at least glance through the article before you leave a comment that other commenters will dunk on you for.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago

because of their huge risk of catastrophe

Dams help prevent natural disasters. Preventing flooding is famously why the Aswan High Dam was built in Egypt, and the presence of flood-managed dams in SEQ is possibly one of the reasons we were affected so much less badly here in 2022 than Northern NSW, where the dams are comparatively small, ungated, and have no active management during flood conditions.

I agree that dams are not great ecologically and we should avoid building them, especially given how incredibly useful solar and wind power are (though wind has its own ecological problems). But it's not especially useful to say that they have a "huge risk of catastrophe".

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

There are a class of American privately owned dams that recently got press for being at risk of catastrophe. I think that's what informed that lemming