this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
163 points (87.2% liked)

News

36534 readers
3793 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 132 points 2 years ago (4 children)

"A reduction in the share of workers can lead to labor shortages, which may raise the bargaining power of employees and lift wages — all of which is ultimately inflationary,” Simona Paravani-Mellinghoff, managing director at BlackRock, wrote in an analysis last year.

And while net immigration has helped offset demographic problems facing rich countries in the past, the shrinking population is now a global phenomenon. “This is critical because it implies advanced economies may start to struggle to ‘import’ labour from such places either via migration or sourcing goods,” wrote Paravani-Mellinghoff.

This is just mask-off capitalism. They want people to have a lot of babies, and/or large numbers of poor and desperate people migrating into the country, so that they have a constant, reliable source of cheap labor.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Paying workers more is inflationary, but raising the cost of goods because you control the supply chain is "business"

Basically, raising product costs to cover increased labour costs are bad because actual workers are getting that money instead of the wealthy capital class.

I wish people understood boycotting more. Sure 6 companies own everything, but remember when the cost of a barrel of oil went significantly negative because people weren't driving for 2 weeks?

If people collectively decided they didn't want to buy anything but the absolute necessary staples for a few months there would be an absolute catastrophe in the supply chain and they'd be forced to lower prices significantly.

They may not lower prices forever, but modern business is built entirely on supply chain logistics. If people stop buying anything, or buy things exclusively to return them we would see some serious changes

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've tried to convince people that if we can have a No Nut November, we ought to be able to put together a No-Sales September or something. These mentally defective executives would absolutely go back to taking care of the customer if this were a practice.

[–] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 years ago

We should definitely do November for it - holiday shopping and Black Friday specifically.

Hell, if we could just boycott Black Friday and the week before and after, which is the biggest retail spend of the year, we’d probably make a serious dent. They aren’t even good deals, but good luck convincing anyone to skip it who doesn’t already.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know what slows down inflation? An upper limit on the cost of goods. But hey im just a filthy commie.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It didn't, not in the US, not in Soviet Union

In the Soviet Union it caused rationing instead. Here's your coupon for 1 stick of butter

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sure buddy those are the only two countries that have existed in the world. So can't work anywhere.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What country would you point to as a success for this policy?

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Can i have your list of valid countries to choose from so that my answer doesn't get disqualified for picking a third world country.

a maximum retail price exists for most if not all goods in India. And it helps slow down inflation.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

India would be perfectly valid if it wasn't experiencing high inflation just like everyone else. Which it is.

https://finimize.com/content/rbi-chief-urges-india-to-cut-inflation-despite-strong-growth

You can't fix inflation just by setting a max price. It leads to shortages or (more common in India's case) retailers finding loopholes:

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/maximum-retail-price-is-an-archaic-dysfunctional-mechanism/article7452745.ece

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't say it solves inflation. You cant stop a global phenomenon happening. You can ease it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Here's India's inflation chart for the past few years: https://www.equentis.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/image-87.png

Here's the US: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEDCPIM158SFRBCLE

They aren't easing anything.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It doesn't work because it's a stupid idea.

If there's a cap on the price of a type of good, then obviously only the lowest quality things get made. If you cap shoes to $10, they will only sell shoes imported from sweatshops.

If you specify exactly how something is made, like $20 for made in USA shoes, they will import it from a sweatshop and sew a logo on it in the US.

If you specify how much labor must be done in the US, there's a chance nobody would bother since selling the $10 sweatshop shoe has better profit margins

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Yeah thats not how the prices are set tho so your entire premise and basis is stupid. Have a good day. Do some reading.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

I'd like to put Simona's mind at ease because economics research into the relationship between wages and productivity shows a casual link where higher wages increase productivity. That is, higher wages force firms to invest in technology, equipment and training in order to offset the increased labor cost.